Abstract
We propose a new measure of similarity for intuitionistic fuzzy sets, and use it to analyze the extent of agreement in a group of experts. The proposed measure takes into account two kinds of distances – one to an object to be compared, and one to its complement. We infer about the similarity of preferences on the basis of a difference between the two types of distances. We show that infering without taking into account a distance to a complement of an object can be misleading.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 20, 87–96 (1986)
Atanassov, K.: Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Bouchon-Meunier, B., Rifgi, M., Bothorel, S.: General measures of comparison of objects. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 84(2), 143–153 (1996)
Chen, S., Yeh, M., Hsiao, P.: A comparison of similarity measures of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 72(1), 79–89 (1995)
Cross, V., Sudkamp, T.: Similarity and Compatibility in Fuzzy Set Theory. Physica, New York (2002)
De Baets, B., Fodor, J. (eds.): Principles of Fuzzy Preference Modelling and Decision Making. Academic Press, London (2003)
Dengfeng, L., Chuntian, C.: New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognitions. Pattern Recognition Letters 23, 221–225 (2002)
Kacprzyk, J.: Group decision making with a fuzzy linguistic majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 18, 105–118 (1986)
Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: Soft consensus measures for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control and Cybernetics 15, 309–323 (1986)
Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. European Journal of Operational Research 34, 315–325 (1988)
Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M.: A human-consistent degree of consensus based on fuzzy logic with linguistic quantifiers. Mathematical Social Sciences 18, 275–290 (1989)
Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 21–32 (1992)
Kang, W.-T.: Protest voting and abstention under plurality rule elections. Journal of Theoretical Politics 16, 71–102 (2004)
Loewer, B., Laddaga, R.: Destroying the consensus. In: Loewer, B. (ed.) Special Issue on Consensus. Synthese, vol. 62, pp. 79–96 (1985)
Pappis, C., Karacapilidis, N.: A comparative assessment of measures of similarity of fuzzy values. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 56, 171–174 (1993)
Szmidt, E.: Applications of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Decision Making. (D.Sc. dissertation) Techn. Univ. Sofia (2000)
Szmidt, E., Baldwin, J.: New Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory and Mass Assignment Theory. Notes on IFSs 9(3), 60–76 (2003)
Szmidt, E., Baldwin, J.: Entropy for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Theory and Mass Assignment Theory. Notes on IFSs 10(3), 15–28 (2004)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Intuitionistic fuzzy sets in group decision making. Notes on IFS 2, 15–32 (1996)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Remarks on some applications of intuitionistic fuzzy sets in decision making. Notes on IFS 2(3), 22–31 (1996)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: On measuring distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Notes on IFS 3(4), 1–13 (1997)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Group Decision Making under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preference Relations. In: IPMU 1998, Paris, La Sorbonne, pp. 172–178 (1998)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Applications of Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets in Decision Making. In: EUSFLAT 1999, pp. 150–158 (1998)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Distances between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 114(3), 505–518 (2000)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: On Measures on Consensus Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Relations. In: IPMU 2000, pp. 1454–1461 (2000)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Distance from Consensus Under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preferences. In: Proc. EUROFUSE Workshop on Preference Modelling and Applications, Granada, pp. 73–78 (2001)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Entropy for intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 118(3), 467–477 (2001)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Analysis of Consensus under Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preferences. In: Proc. Int. Conf. in Fuzzy Logic and Technology. De Montfort Univ. Leicester, UK, pp. 79–82 (2001)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: An Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set Based Approach to Intelligent Data Analysis (an application to medical diagnosis). In: Abraham, A., Jain, L., Kacprzyk, J. (eds.) Recent Advances in Intelligent Paradigms and and Applications, pp. 57–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Analysis of Agreement in a Group of Experts via Distances Between Intuitionistic Fuzzy Preferences. In: Proc. 9th Int. Conf. IPMU 2002, Annecy, France, pp. 1859–1865 (2002)
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Similarity of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and the Jaccard coefficient. In: Proc. 10th Int. Conf. IPMU 2004, Perugia, Italy, pp. 1405–1412 (2004)
Tversky, A.: Features of similarity. Psychol. Rev. 84, 327–352 (1977)
Wang, X., De Baets, B., Kerre, E.: A comparative study of similarity measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 73(2), 259–268 (1995)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8, 338–353 (1965)
Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput. Math. Appl. 9(1), 149–184 (1983)
Zwick, R., Carlstein, E., Budescu, D.: Measures of similarity among fuzzy concepts: A comparative analysis. Int. J. of Approx. Reasoning 1, 221–242 (1987)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J. (2005). A New Concept of a Similarity Measure for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets and Its Use in Group Decision Making. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Miyamoto, S. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3558. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11526018_27
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11526018_27
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27871-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31883-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)