Abstract
Building access control represents an important application for biometric verification but often requires greater accuracy than can be provided by a single verifier. Even as algorithms continue to improve, poor samples and environmental factors will continue to impact performance in the building environment. We aim to improve verification accuracy by combining decisions from multiple verifiers spread throughout a building. In particular, we combine verifiers along the path traced out by each subject. When combining these decisions, the assumption of conditional independence simplifies implementation but can potentially lead to suboptimal performance. Through empirical evaluation of two related algorithms, we show that the assumption of conditional independence does not significantly impact verification accuracy. We argue that such a small reduction in accuracy can be attributed to the relative accuracy of each verifier. As a result, decisions can be combined using low complexity fusion rules without concerns of degraded accuracy.
This work has been supported in part by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Building and Fire Research Laboratory
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Kittler, J., Messer, K.: Fusion of multiple experts in multimodal biometric personal identity verification systems. In: Proc. 12th IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, pp. 3–12 (2002)
Ben-Yacoub, S.: Multi-modal data fusion for person authentication using SVM. In: Proc. of the Second International Conference on Audio- and Video-based Biometric Person Authentication (AVBPA 1999), pp. 25–30 (1999)
Hong, L., Jain, A.: Integrating faces and fingerprints for personal identification. IEEE Trans. on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 20, 1295–1307 (1998)
Ross, A., Jain, A.: Information fusion in biometrics. Pattern Recognition Letters 24, 2115–2125 (2003)
Beattie, M., Kumar, B.V.K., Vijaya, L.S., Tonguz, O.: Building access control using coordinated biometric verification. In: Biometrics: Challenges arising from Theory to Practice (BCTP) Workshop, Proceedings (2004)
Domingos, P., Pazzani, M.: On the optimality of the simple bayesian classifier under zero-one loss. Machine Learning 29, 103–130 (1997)
Luettin, J., Maitre., G.: Evaluation protocol for the extended M2VTS database (XM2VTSDB). Technical Report IDIAP-COM 05, Dalle Molle Institute for Perceptual Artificial Intelligence, IDIAP (1998)
Matas, J., et al.: Comparison of face verification results on the XM2VTS database. In: Proceedings of 15th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, vol. 4, pp. 858–863 (2000)
Kuncheva, L.I., Ten, C.W.: measures of diversity in classifier ensembles: limits for two classifiers. In: A DERA/IEE Workshop on Intelligent Sensor Processing (2001)
Chang, C., Lin, C.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines (2001), Software available at http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/cjlin/libsvm
Bailly-Bailliere, E., et al.: The BANCA database and evaluation protocol. In: Kittler, J., Nixon, M.S. (eds.) AVBPA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2688, Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Beattie, M., Kumar, B.V.K.V., Lucey, S., Tonguz, O.K. (2005). Combining Verification Decisions in a Multi-vendor Environment. In: Kanade, T., Jain, A., Ratha, N.K. (eds) Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication. AVBPA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3546. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11527923_42
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11527923_42
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-27887-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31638-1
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)