Skip to main content

A Design Foundation for a Trust-Modeling Experimental Testbed

  • Conference paper
Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies (TRUST 2004, TRUST 2003)

Abstract

Mechanisms for modeling trust and reputation to improve robustness and performance in multi-agent societies make up a growing field of research that has yet to establish unified direction or benchmarks. The trust research community will benefit significantly from the development of a competition testbed; such development is currently in progress under the direction of the Agent Reputation and Trust (art) Testbed initiative. A testbed can serve in two roles: 1) as a competition forum in which researchers can compare their technologies against objective metrics, and 2) as a suite of tools with flexible parameters, allowing researchers to perform easily-repeatable experiments. As a versatile, universal experimentation site, a competition testbed challenges researchers to solve the most prominent problems in the field, fosters a cohesive scoping of trust research problems, identifies successful technologies, and provides researchers with a tool for comparing and validating their approaches. In addition, a competition testbed places trust research in the public spotlight, improving confidence in the technology and highlighting relevant applications. This paper lays the foundation for testbed development by enumerating the important problems in trust and reputation research, describing important requirements for a competition testbed, and addressing necessary parameters for testbed modularity and flexibility. Finally, the art Testbed initiative is highlighted, and future progress toward testbed development is described.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Barber, K.S., Fullam, K., Kim, J.: Challenges for trust, fraud, and deception research in multi-agent systems. Trust, Reputation, and Security: Theories and Practice, 8–14 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fullam, K., Barber, K.S.: Evaluating approaches for trust and reputation research: Exploring a competition testbed. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Reputation in Agent Societies at Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2004), Beijing, pp. 20–23 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sabater, J.: Toward a test-bed for trust and reputation models. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 101–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. ART Testbed Team: Agent Reputation and Trust Testbed (2005), http://www.lips.utexas.edu/~kfullam/competition/

  5. Schillo, M., Funk, P., Rovatsos, M.: Using trust for detecting deceitful agents in artificial societites. In: Applied Artificial Intelligence, pp. 825–848 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Mui, L., Mohtashemi, M., Halberstadt, A.: Notions of reputation in multi-agent systems: A review. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, pp. 280–287 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Marsh, S.: Formalising Trust as a Computational Concept. PhD thesis, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, University of Stirling (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Verhoeff, T.: The trader’s dilemma: A continuous version of the prisoner’s dilemma. Technical report, Computing Science Notes 93/02, Faculty of Mathematics and Computing Science, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The Netherlands (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Zacharia, G.: Collaborative reputation mechanisms for online communities. Master’s thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Regret: A reputation model for gregarious societies. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Montreal, Canada, pp. 61–69 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Carbo, J., Molina, J., Davila, J.: Trust management through fuzzy reputation. Int. Journal in Cooperative Information Systems 12, 135–155 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Carbo, J., Molina, J., Davila, J.: Comparing predictions of sporas vs. a fuzzy reputation agent system. In: 3rd International Conference on Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Systems, Interlaken, pp. 147–153 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, pp. 475–482 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, B., Singh, M.P.: Towards a probabilistic model of distributed reputation management. In: Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies, Montreal, Canada, pp. 125–137 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. eBay: eBay (2002), http://www.eBay.com

  16. BizRate: BizRate (2002), http://www.bizrate.com

  17. Fullam, K., Barber, K.S.: A temporal policy for trusting information. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 47–57 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fullam, K.: An expressive belief revision framework based on information valuation. Master’s thesis, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, The University of Texas at Austin (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Klos, T., la Poutre, H.: Using reputation-based trust for assessing agent reliability. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 75–82 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Whitby, A., Josang, A., Indulska, J.: Filtering out unfair ratings in bayesian reputation systems. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 106–117 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ghanea-Hercock, R.: The cost of trust. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 58–64 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Yamamoto, H., Ishida, K., Ohta, T.: Trust formation in a c2c market: Effect of reputation management system. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 126–136 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ding, L., Kolari, P., Ganjugunte, S., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: On modeling and evaluating trust networks inference. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 21–32 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Barber, K.S., Kim, J.: Belief revision process based on trust: Agent evaluating reputation of information sources. In: Trust in Cyber-societies: Integrating the Human and Artificial Perspectives. LNCS, pp. 73–82. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Huynh, D., Jennings, N., Shadbolt, N.: Developing an integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 65–74 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fujimura, K., Tanimoto, N., Iguchi, M.: Calculating contribution in cyberspace community using reputation system ’rumor’. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 40–46 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Falcone, R., Pezzulo, G., Castelfranchi, C., Calvi, G.: Trusting the agents and the environment leads to successful delegation: A contract net simulation. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 33–39 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Neville, B., Pitt, J.: A simulation study of social agents in agent mediated e-commerce. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2004), New York, USA, pp. 83–91 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Biswas, A.S., Sen, S., Debnath, S.: Limiting deception in groups of social agents. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at Autonomous Agents, Seattle, Washington, pp. 21–28 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Barber, K.S., Fullam, K.: Applying reputation models to continuous belief revision. In: Proceedings of The Workshop on Deception, Fraud and Trust in Agent Societies at The Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 6–15 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Sen, S., Sajja, N.: Robustness of reputation-based trust: Boolean case. In: Proceedings of the first international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2002), Bologna, Italy, pp. 288–293 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  32. UCI: UCI (2004), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  33. Castelfranchi, C., Falcone, R.: Towards a theory of delegation for agent-based systems. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 24, 141–157 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fullam, K.K., Sabater-Mir, J., Barber, K.S. (2005). A Design Foundation for a Trust-Modeling Experimental Testbed. In: Falcone, R., Barber, S., Sabater-Mir, J., Singh, M.P. (eds) Trusting Agents for Trusting Electronic Societies. TRUST TRUST 2004 2003. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3577. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11532095_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11532095_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28012-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31859-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics