Skip to main content

The MathSAT 3 System

  • Conference paper
Automated Deduction – CADE-20 (CADE 2005)

Abstract

Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) can be seen as an extended form of propositional satisfiability, where propositions are either simple boolean propositions or quantifier-free atomic constraints in a specific theory.

This work has been partly supported by ISAAC, an European sponsored project, contract no. AST3-CT-2003-501848, by ORCHID, a project sponsored by Provincia Autonoma di Trento, and by BOWLING, a project sponsored by a grant from Intel Corporation. The work of T. Junttila has also been supported by the Academy of Finland, projects 53695 and 211025.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ackermann, W.: Solvable Cases of the Decision Problem. North Holland Pub. Co, Amsterdam (1954)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Armando, A., Castellini, C., Giunchiglia, E., Maratea, M.: A SAT-Based Decision Procedure for the Boolean Combination of Difference Constraints. In: Hoos, H., Mitchell, D.G. (eds.) SAT 2004. LNCS, vol. 3542, pp. 16–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Audemard, G., Bertoli, P., Cimatti, A., Korniłowicz, A., Sebastiani, R.: A SAT based approach for solving formulas over boolean and linear mathematical propositions. In: Voronkov, A. (ed.) CADE 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2392, pp. 195–210. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Audemard, G., Bertoli, P., Cimatti, A., Korniłowicz, A., Sebastiani, R.: Integrating boolean and mathematical solving: Foundations, basic algorithms, and requirements. In: Calmet, J., Benhamou, B., Caprotti, O., Hénocque, L., Sorge, V. (eds.) AISC 2002 and Calculemus 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2385, pp. 231–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Badros, G.J., Borning, A., Stuckey, P.J.: The Cassowary Linear Arithmetic Constraint Solving Algorithm. ACM Trans. on Computer-Human Interaction 8(4), 267–306 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bozzano, M., Bruttomesso, R., Cimatti, A., Junttila, T., Ranise, S., van Rossum, P., Sebastiani, R.: Efficient satisfiability modulo theories via delayed theory combination. In: Etessami, K., Rajamani, S.K. (eds.) CAV 2005. LNCS, vol. 3576, pp. 335–349. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Bozzano, M., Bruttomesso, R., Cimatti, A., Junttila, T., van Rossum, P., Schulz, S., Sebastiani, R.: An incremental and layered procedure for the satisfiability of linear arithmetic logic. In: Halbwachs, N., Zuck, L.D. (eds.) TACAS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3440, pp. 317–333. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Bozzano, M., Bruttomesso, R., Cimatti, A., Junttila, T., van Rossum, P., Schulz, S., Sebastiani, R.: MathSAT: Tight Integration of SAT and Mathematical Decision Procedure. Journal of Automated Reasoning (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cherkassky, B.V., Goldberg, A.V.: Negative-Cycle Detection Algorithms. Mathematical Programming 85(2), 277–311 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Eén, N., Sörensson, N.: An extensible SAT-solver. In: Giunchiglia, E., Tacchella, A. (eds.) SAT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2919, pp. 502–518. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Flanagan, C., Joshi, R., Ou, X., Saxe, J.B.: Theorem proving using lazy proof explication. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 355–367. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganzinger, H., Hagen, G., Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A., Tinelli, C.: DPLL(T): Fast decision procedures. In: Alur, R., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 2004. LNCS, vol. 3114, pp. 175–188. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Gomes, C.P., Selman, B., Kautz, H.A.: Boosting Combinatorial Search Through Randomization. In: AAAI/IAAI 1998, pp. 431–437. AAAI Press / The MIT Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jaffar, J., Michaylov, S., Stuckey, P.J., Yap, R.H.C.: The CLP(R) Language and System. ACM Trans. on Programming Languages and Systems 14(3), 339–395 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Marques-Silva, J.P., Sakallah, K.A.: GRASP: A Search Algorithm for Propositional Satisfiability. IEEE Trans. on Computers 48(5), 506–521 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Moskewicz, M.W., Madigan, C.F., Zhao, Y., Zhang, L., Malik, S.: Chaff: Engineering an Efficient SAT Solver. In: DAC 2001, pp. 530–535. ACM, New York (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Nieuwenhuis, R., Oliveras, A.: Congruence Closure with Integer Offsets. In: Y. Vardi, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2850, pp. 78–90. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Omega, http://www.cs.umd.edu/projects/omega

  19. Schulz, S.: E – A Brainiac Theorem Prover. AI Communications 15(2/3), 111–126 (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bozzano, M. et al. (2005). The MathSAT 3 System. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (eds) Automated Deduction – CADE-20. CADE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3632. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11532231_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11532231_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28005-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31864-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics