Skip to main content

Usability Comparison of Mouse-Based Interaction Techniques for Predictable 3d Rotation

  • Conference paper
Smart Graphics (SG 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 3638))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Due to the progress in computer graphics hardware high resolution 3d models may be explored at interactive frame rates, and facilities to explore them are a part of modern radiological workstations and therapy planning systems. Despite their advantages, 3d visualizations are only employed by a minority of potential users and even these employ 3d visualizations for a few selected tasks only. We hypothesize that this results from a lack of intuitive interaction techniques for 3d rotation. In this paper, we compare existing techniques with respect to design principles derived by clinical applications and present results of an empirical study. These results are relevant beyond clinical applications and strongly suggest that the presented design principles are crucial for comfortable and predictable interaction techniques for 3d rotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bade, R.: Evaluation of 3d rotation techniques (April 2005), http://wwwisg.cs.uni-magdeburg.de/cv/projects/LST/rotation

  2. Balakrishnan, R., Kurtenbach, G.: Exploring bimanual camera control and object manipulation in 3D graphics interfaces. In: Proc. of ACM SIGCHI 1999, pp. 56–62 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, G.: Bell’s Trackball (1988), http://members.tripod.com/professor_tom/index.html

  4. Britton, E.G., Lipscomb, J.S., Pique, M.E.: Making nested rotations convenient for the user. In: Proc. of SIGGRAPH 1978, pp. 222–227 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chapanis, A., Kinkade, R.: Design of Controls. In: van Cott, H., Kinkade, R. (eds.) Human Engineering Guide to Equipment Design, US Government Printing Office (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, M., Mountford, S.J., Sellen, A.: A study in interactive 3D rotation using 2D control devices. Computer Graphics 22(4), 121–129 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Discreet: Discreet 3D-Studio-Max (April 2005), http://www.discreet.com/3dsmax

  8. Henriksen, K., Sporring, J., Hornbæk, K.: Virtual trackballs revisited. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 10(2), 206–216 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hinckley, K., Tullio, J., Pausch, R., Proffitt, D., Kassel, N.: Usability analysis of 3D rotation techniques. In: Proc. of ACM UIST 1997, pp. 1–10 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hultquist, J.: A Virtual Trackball. Graphics Gems, pp. 462–463. Academic Press, London (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jacob, I., Oliver, J.: Evaluation of Techniques for Specifying 3D Rotations with 2D Input Device. In: Proc. of HCI 1995, pp. 63–76 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kitware Inc.: VTK Home Page (April 2005), http://www.vtk.org

  13. Krueger, A., Tietjen, C., Hintze, J., Preim, B., Hertel, I., Strauss, G.: Interactive Visualization for Neck Dissection Planning. In: Proc. of IEEE EuroVis 2005, pp. 295–302 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Macromedia: Macromedia Director (April 2005), http://www.macromedia.com/software/director

  15. Partala, T.: Controlling a Single 3D Object: Viewpoint Metaphors, Speed and Subjective Satisfaction. In: Proc. of INTERACT 1999, pp. 486–493. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Right Hemisphere: Deep Exploration (April 2005), http://www.righthemisphere.com/products/dexp

  17. SGI: SGI - Developer Central Open Source | Open Inventor (April 2005), http://oss.sgi.com/projects/inventor

  18. Shoemake, K.: ARCBALL: A user interface for specifying three-dimensional orientation using a mouse. In: Proc. of Graphics Interface, pp. 151–156 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Strauss, P.S., Carey, R.: An object-oriented 3D graphics toolkit. In: Proc. of SIGGRAPH 1992, pp. 341–349 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bade, R., Ritter, F., Preim, B. (2005). Usability Comparison of Mouse-Based Interaction Techniques for Predictable 3d Rotation. In: Butz, A., Fisher, B., Krüger, A., Olivier, P. (eds) Smart Graphics. SG 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3638. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11536482_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11536482_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28179-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31905-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics