Skip to main content

An Investigation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms on Power and Trust: A Domain Study of Online Trust in e-Auctions

  • Conference paper
Trust, Privacy, and Security in Digital Business (TrustBus 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3592))

Abstract

Auctions have experienced one of the most successful transitions from a ‘bricks and mortar’ presence into an online environment. However, online auctions have one of the highest percentages of disputes and online fraud. This research investigates people’s perceptions of dispute resolution prior to an online transaction. People’s perceptions of ‘power to resolve’ a dispute is investigated as factor that may impact people’s perceptions of online trust of e-business.

A research model is proposed that is founded in online trust theory. The research design is a quantitative study. Data collected is analysed using analysis of variance testing, and structural equation modeling (SEM). This research provides a better understanding of the dispute resolution phenomenon, and potentially opens up a new direction of research into dispute avoidance. A new ‘power to resolve’ construct is developed to extend theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Nadler, J.: Electronically-Mediated Dispute Resolution and E-Commerce. Negotiation Journal, 333–347 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jarvenpaa, S.L., Tractinsky, N., Vitale, M.: Consumer Trust in an Internet Store: A Cross-Cultural Validation. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication 5(2) (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lind, E.A.: Social Conflict and Social Justice: Some Lessons from the Social Psychology of Justice. Leiden University Press, Leiden (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. van den Bos, K., van Schie, E.C.M., Colenberg, S.E.: Parents’ Reactions to Child Day Care Organizations: The Influence of Perceptions of Procedures and the Role of Organizations’ Trustworthiness. Social Justice Research 15(1), 53–62 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. McKnight, H., Cummings, L.L., Chervany, N.L.: Initial Trust Formation in New Organizational Relationships. The Academy of Management Review 23(3), 473–490 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mayer, R.C., Davis, H., Schoorman, F.D.: An Integration Model of Organizational Trust. The Academy of Management Review 20(3), 709–727 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pavlou, P.A., Gefen, D.: Building Effective Online Marketplaces with Institution-Based Trust. In: Twenty-Third International Conference on Information Systems, pp. 1–9 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pavlou, P.A., Tan, Y.-H., Gefen, D.: The Transitional Role of Institutional Trust in Online Interorganizational Relationships. In: Proceedings of the 36th HICSS Conference, Hawaii (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. French Jr., J.R.P., Raven, B.H.: The Bases of Social power. In: I. D. C. (ed.) Studies in Social Power, pp. 150–167. Institute for Social Research, MI (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Thorelli, H.B.: Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies. Strategic Management Journal 7, 37–51 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Geyskens, I., Steenkamp, J.-B.E.M., Kumar, N.: Generalizations about Trust in Marketing Channel Relationships Using Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing 15, 223–248 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Beck, C.J.A., Sales, B.D.: A Critical Reappraisal of Divorce Mediation Research and Policy. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 6(4), 989–1056 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sitkin, S.B., Pablo, A.L.: Reconceptualizing the Determinants of Risk Behavior. The Academy of Management Review 17(1), 9–32 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Akerlof, G.A.: The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 84(3), 488–500 (1970)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Judd, C.M., Smith, E.R., Kidder, L.H.: Research Methods in Social Relations. Harcourt Brace, Orlando (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raven, B.H.: The Bases of Power: Origins and Recent Developments. Journal of Social Issues 49(4), 227–253 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Keller, G., Warrack, B.: Statistics for Management and Economics. Duxbury Press, California (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Chin, W.W., Marcolin, B.L., Newsted, P.R.: A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic Mail Emotion/Adoption. Information Systems Research 14(2), 189–217 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chin, W.W.: Issues and Opinion on Structural Equation Modelling. MIS Quarterly 22(1), vii-xvi (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gefen, D., Straub, D.W., Boudreau, M.C.: Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4(7), 1–70 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., Straub, D.W.: Trust and TAM in Online Shopping: An Integrated Model. MIS Quarterly 27(1), 51–90 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Fornell, C., Larcker, D.F.: Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error. Journal of Marketing Research 18, 39–50 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mitchell, V.-W.: Consumer Perceived Risk: Conceptualisations and Models. European Journal of Marketing 33(1/2), 163–192 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bewsell, G., Jamieson, R., Gardiner, A., Bunker, D. (2005). An Investigation of Dispute Resolution Mechanisms on Power and Trust: A Domain Study of Online Trust in e-Auctions. In: Katsikas, S., López, J., Pernul, G. (eds) Trust, Privacy, and Security in Digital Business. TrustBus 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3592. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11537878_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11537878_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28224-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31796-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics