Skip to main content

Testing Periodicity

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3624))

Abstract

A string α∈Σn is called p-periodic, if for every i,j ∈ {1,...,n}, such that \(i\equiv j \bmod p\), α i = α j , where α i is the i-th place of α. A string α∈Σn is said to be period(≤ g), if there exists p∈ {1,...,g} such that α is p-periodic.

An ε-property tester for period(≤ g) is a randomized algorithm, that for an input α distinguishes between the case that α is in period(≤ g) and the case that one needs to change at least ε-fraction of the letters of α, so that it will become period(≤ g). The complexity of the tester is the number of letter-queries it makes to the input. We study here the complexity of ε-testers for period(≤ g) when g varies in the range \(1,\dots,\frac{n}{2}\). We show that there exists a surprising exponential phase transition in the query complexity around g=log n. That is, for every δ > 0 and for each g, such that g≥ (logn)1 + δ, the number of queries required and sufficient for testing period(≤ g) is polynomial in g. On the other hand, for each \(g\leq \frac{log{n}}{4}\), the number of queries required and sufficient for testing period(≤ g) is only poly-logarithmic in g.

We also prove an exact asymptotic bound for testing general periodicity. Namely, that 1-sided error, non adaptive ε-testing of periodicity (\(period(\leq \frac{n}{2})\)) is \(\Theta(\sqrt{n\log{n}})\) queries.

This research was supported by THE ISRAEL SCIENCE FOUNDATION (grant number 55/03).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Goldwasser, S., Goldreich, O., Ron, D.: Property testing and its connection to learning and approximation. Journal of the ACM 45, 653–750 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Rubinfeld, R., Sudan, M.: Robust characterization of polynomials with applications to program testing. SIAM Journal of Computing 25, 252–271 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Ergun, F., Muthukrishnan, S., Sahinalp, C.: Sub-linear methods for detecting periodic trends in data streams. In: Farach-Colton, M. (ed.) LATIN 2004. LNCS, vol. 2976, pp. 16–28. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Indyk, P., Koudas, N., Muthukrishnan, S.: Identifying representative trends in massive time series data sets using sketches. In: VLDB 2000, Proceedings of 26th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Cairo, Egypt, September 10-14, pp. 363–372. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Krauthgamer, R., Sasson, O.: Property testing of data dimensionality. In: Proceedings of the fourteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp. 18–27 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gilbert, C., Guha, S., Indyk, P., Muthukrishnan, S., Strauss, M.: Near-optimal sparse fourier representations via sampling. In: STOC 2002, Proceedings of the thirty-fourth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing, pp. 152–161 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Samorodnitsky, A., Trevisan, L.: A PCP characterization of NP with optimal amortized query complexity. In: Proc. of the 32 ACM STOC, pp. 191–199 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hästad, J., Wigderson, A.: Simple analysis of graph tests for linearity and pcp. Random Struct. Algorithms 22(2), 139–160 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Fischer, E.: The art of uninformed decisions: A primer to property testing. The computational complexity column of The Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science 75, 97–126 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Ron, D.: Property testing (a tutorial). In: Handbook of Randomized computing, pp. 597–649. Kluwer Press, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hadamard, J.: Sur la distribution des zéros de la fonction ζ(s) et ses conséquences arithmétiques. Bull. Soc. Math. France 24, 199–220 (1896)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Poussin, V.: Recherces analytiques sur la théorie des nombres premiers. Ann. Soc. Sci. Bruxelles (1897)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Newman, D.J.: Simple analytic proof of the prime number theorem. Amer. Math. Monthly 87, 693–696 (1980)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lachish, O., Newman, I. (2005). Testing Periodicity. In: Chekuri, C., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Trevisan, L. (eds) Approximation, Randomization and Combinatorial Optimization. Algorithms and Techniques. APPROX RANDOM 2005 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3624. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11538462_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11538462_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28239-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31874-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics