Abstract
This talk tries to distill several years of experience using both model checking and static analysis to find errors in large software systems. We initially thought that the tradeoffs between the two was clear: static analysis was easy but would mainly find shallow bugs, while model checking would require more work but would be strictly better — it would find more errors, the errors would be deeper and the approach would be more powerful. These expectations were often wrong. This talk will describe some of the sharper tradeoffs between the two, as well as a detailed discussion of one domain — finding errors in file systems code — where model checking seems to work very well.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Engler, D. (2005). Static Analysis Versus Model Checking for Bug Finding. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds) CONCUR 2005 – Concurrency Theory. CONCUR 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3653. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11539452_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11539452_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28309-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31934-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)