Skip to main content

Consensus Measures and Adjusting Inconsistency of Linguistic Preference Relations in Group Decision Making

  • Conference paper
Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3613))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a method for consensus measures and adjusting inconsistency of linguistic preference relations in group decision-making (GDM). Several consensus measures are defined by comparing positions of alternatives between individual ordered vectors and a collective ordered vector. In such a way, the consensus situation is evaluated in each moment in a more realistic way. Feedback mechanism would be applied if the consensus degree of all experts does not reach the required consensus level. This feedback mechanism is simple and easy computing process to help experts change their opinions in order to obtain the consensus level. It is based on the use of individual linguistic preferences, collective and individual ordered vectors of alternatives. It is also based on the use of fuzzy majority of consensus, represented by means of a linguistic quantifier.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Saaty, T.A.: The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Orlorski, S.A.: Decision-making with a fuzzy preference relation. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 3, 155–167 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A Consensus Model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 3, 394–402 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 175–190 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A sequential selection process in group decision making with linguistic assessment. Information Science 4, 223–239 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: A Model of Consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1, 73–87 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera, F., Herrera-Viedma, E., Verdegay, J.L.: Linguistic Measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Journal of Approximate Reasoning 3, 309–334 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z.P., Xiao, S.H.: Consistency and Ranking method for comparison matrix with linguistic assessment. Systems Engineering-Theory & Practice 5, 87–91 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fan, ZP., Chen, X. (2005). Consensus Measures and Adjusting Inconsistency of Linguistic Preference Relations in Group Decision Making. In: Wang, L., Jin, Y. (eds) Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. FSKD 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3613. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11539506_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11539506_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28312-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31830-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics