Skip to main content

A New Method for Fuzzy Group Decision Making Based on α-Level Cut and Similarity

  • Conference paper
Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery (FSKD 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3614))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 943 Accesses

Abstract

Let opinions of experts among group decision making be represented as L-R fuzzy numbers. The difference of two experts’ opinions is reflected by two distances, which are called the left-hand side distance and the right-hand side one. A method to calculate two types of distances based on the same α-level is presented. Then the distances are employed to construct a new similarity function to measure the similarity degrees of both sides which represent the pessimistic and optimistic similarity degrees between the experts, respectively. The degree of importance of each expert among group decision making is obtained by employing Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process (AHP). The method of aggregating individual fuzzy opinions into a group consensus opinion by combining similarity degrees and the degree of importance of each expert is proposed. Finally some properties of the proposed similarity measure are proved and some numeric examples are shown to illustrate our method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bardossy, A., Duckstein, L., Bogardi: Combination of fuzzy numbers representing expert opinions. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 57, 173–181 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Diamond, P., Kloeden, P.: Metric Spaces of Fuzzy Sets: Theory and Application. World Scientific, Singapore (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, H.S.: Optimal consensus of fuzzy opinions under group decision making environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 132, 303–315 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Fan, J., Xie, W.: Distance measure and induced fuzzy entropy. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 104, 305–314 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fedrizzi, M., Kacprzyk, J.: On measuring consensus in the setting of fuzzy preference relations. In: Kacprayk, J., Roubens, M. (eds.) Non-conventional preference Relations in Decision Making, pp. 129–141. Springer, Berlin (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Goetschel, R., Voxman, W.: Topological Properties of Fuzzy Sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 10, 87–99 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Hsu, H.M., Chen, C.T.: Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 79, 279–285 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishikawa, A., Ambiguous, M., Shiga, T.: The max-min Delpi method and fuzzy Delphi method via fuzzy intergration. Fuzzy sets and Systems 55, 241–253 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kacprzyk, J., Federation, M.: A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial(fuzzy) preferences. Eur.J.OR. 34, 315–325 (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kacprzyk, J., Federation, M., Norm, H.: Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 21–31 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Kaleva, O., Siekkala, S.: On fuzzy metric spaces. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 12(3), 301–317 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Klir, G.J., Yuan, B.: Fuzzy Sets and Fuzzy Logic: Theory and Applications. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Koczy, L.T., Hirota, K.: Ordering and closeness of fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 90, 103–111 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Kuz’min, V.B.: A parametric approach to the description of linguistic variables and hedges. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6, 27–41 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Nurmi, H.: Approaches to collective decision making with fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 6, 249–259 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Saaty, T.L.: Modeling unstructured decision problems-the theory of analytical hierarchies. Math. Comput. Simulation 20, 147–158 (1978)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanino, T.: On group decision making under fuzzy preferences. In: Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.) Multiperson Decision Making Using Fuzzy Sets and Prossibility Theory, pp. 172–185. Kilowatt Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Williams, J., Steele, N.: Difference, distance and similarity as a basis for fuzzy decision support based on prototypical decision classes. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 131, 35–46 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Xu, R.N., Zhai, X.Y.: Extensions of the analytic hierarchy process in fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 52, 251–257 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lan, J., He, L., Wang, Z. (2005). A New Method for Fuzzy Group Decision Making Based on α-Level Cut and Similarity. In: Wang, L., Jin, Y. (eds) Fuzzy Systems and Knowledge Discovery. FSKD 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3614. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11540007_61

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11540007_61

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28331-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31828-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics