Skip to main content

Automatic Generation of Semantic Fields for Resource Discovery in the Semantic Web

  • Conference paper
Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3588))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper we present and evaluate two approaches for the generation of Semantic Fields, which are used as a tool for resource discovery in the Semantic Web. We mainly concern ourselves with semantic networks that describe their interests and resources by means of ontologies. Semantic Fields are intended to help users to locate these resources by specifying a brief description (also as an ontology). We propose two ways to automatically build Semantic Fields. The first one is used in the KREIOS approach, which is based on the pre-computation of distances between all the ontology pairs. The second one is based on a fast incremental clustering algorithm, which groups together similar ontologies as they are published. These groups constitute a pre-computed set of Semantic Fields.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bertino, E., Guerrini, G., Mesiti, M.: A Matching Algorithm for Measuring the Structural Similarity between an XML Document and a DTD and its Applications. Information Systems 29(1), 23–46 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Budanitsky, A., Hirst, G.: Semantic Distance in WordNet: An Experimental, Application-oriented Evaluation of Five Measures. In: Workshop on WordNet and Other Lexical Resources, NAACL 2000, Pittsburgh (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dalamagas, T., Cheng, T., Winkel, K.-J., Sellis, T.: A methodology for clustering XML documents by structure. Information Systems (in Press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Doan, A., et al.: Learning to Match Ontologies on the Semantic Web. VLDB Journal 12(4), 303–319 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Crespo, A., Garcia-Molina, H.: Semantic Overlay Networks for P2P Systems. Technical report, Computer Science Department, Stanford University (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-Match: an Algorithm and an Implementation of Semantic Matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong-Hai, D., Erhard, R.: COMA - A System for Flexible Combination of Schema Matching Approaches. In: Proc. 28th Intl. Conference on Very Large Databases (VLDB), Hongkong (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hess, A., Johnston, E., Kushmerick, N.: ASSAM: A Tool for Semi-automatically Annotating Semantic Web Services. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 320–334. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Navas, I., Roldán, M.M., Aldana, J.F.: Kreios: Towards Semantic Interoperable Systems. In: Yakhno, T. (ed.) ADVIS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3261, pp. 161–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Lee, M., Yang, L., Hsu, W., Yang, X.: XClust: clustering XML schemas for effective integration. In: Proc. CIKM 2002, pp. 292–299 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Sanz, I., Pérez, J.M., Berlanga, R., Aramburu, M.J.: XML Schemata Inference and Evolution. In: Mařík, V., Štěpánková, O., Retschitzegger, W. (eds.) DEXA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2736, pp. 109–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-Based Ontology Alignment in OWL-Lite. In: ECAI 2004, Valencia, pp. 333–337 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Maedche, A., Staab, S.: Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 251–263. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Rodriquez, M.A., Egenhofer, M.J.: Determining Semantic Similarity Among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge Data Engineering 15(2), 442–456 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Salton, G.: Automatic Text Processing. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yang, B., Garcia-Molina, H.: Comparing Hybrid Peer-to-peer systems. In: Proc. of the 27th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Rome, Italy (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Navas, I., Sanz, I., Aldana, J.F., Berlanga, R. (2005). Automatic Generation of Semantic Fields for Resource Discovery in the Semantic Web. In: Andersen, K.V., Debenham, J., Wagner, R. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3588. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11546924_69

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11546924_69

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28566-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31729-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics