Skip to main content

Non-destructive Integration of Form-Based Views

  • Conference paper
Advances in Databases and Information Systems (ADBIS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3631))

Abstract

Form documents or screen forms bring essential information on the data manipulated by an organization. They can be considered as different but often overlapping views of its whole data. This paper presents a non-destructive approach of their integration. The main idea of our approach is to keep the original views intact and to specify constraints between overlapping structures. For reasoning over constraints, we provide a set of inference rules that allows not only to infer implied constraints but also to detect conflicts. These reasoning rules are proved to be sound and complete. Although the form-based views are hierarchical structures, our constraints and reasoning rules can also be used in non-hierarchical data models.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Batini, C., Lenzerini, M., Navathe, S.B.: A comparative analysis of methodologies for database schema integration. ACM Comput. Surv. 18, 323–364 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Shipman, D.W.: The functional data model and the data language DAPLEX. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 6, 140–173 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Halpin, T.: Information modeling and relational databases: from conceptual analysis to logical design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lenzerini, M.: Data integration: A theoretical perspective. In: PODS, pp. 233–246 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bergamaschi, S., Sartori, C.: On taxonomic reasoning in conceptual design. ACM Trans. Database Syst. 17, 385–422 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Formica, A., Missikoff, M.: Inheritance processing and conflicts in structural generalization hierarchies. ACM Comput. Surv. 36, 263–290 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Information integration: Conceptual modeling and reasoning support. In: Proc. of the 6th Int. Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems (CoopIS 1998), pp. 280–291 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kashyap, V., Sheth, A.P.: Semantic and schematic similarities between database objects: A context-based approach. VLDB J. 5, 276–304 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Calvanese, D., De Giacomo, G., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Source integration in data warehousing. In: Proc. of the 9th Int. Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1998), pp. 192–197. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Brachman, R., Schmolze, J.: An overview of the KL-ONE knowledge representation system. Cognitive Science, 171–216 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kirk, T., Levy, A.Y., Sagiv, Y., Srivastava, D.: The Information Manifold. In: Knoblock, C., Levy, A. (eds.) Information Gathering from Heterogeneous, Distributed Environments. Stanford University, Stanford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., Rosati, R.: Description logic framework for information integration. In: KR, pp. 2–13 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Brachman, R., Levesque, H.: The tractability of subsumption in frame-based description languages. In: AAAI 1984, Austin, Texas, pp. 34–37 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Borgida, A., Brachman, R.J., McGuinness, D.L., Resnick, L.A.: CLASSIC: a structural data model for objects. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Portland, Oregon, pp. 58–67 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nutt, W., Donini, F.M., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D.: The complexity of concept languages. Inf. Comput. 134, 1–58 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Horrocks, I., Sattler, U.: A description logic with transitive and inverse roles and role hierarchies. Journal of Logic and Computation 9, 385–410 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hidders, J., Paredaens, J., Thiran, P., Houben, GJ., van Hee, K. (2005). Non-destructive Integration of Form-Based Views. In: Eder, J., Haav, HM., Kalja, A., Penjam, J. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3631. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11547686_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11547686_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28585-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31895-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics