Skip to main content

A Comparative Evaluation of Rough Sets and Probabilistic Network Algorithms on Learning Pseudo-independent Domains

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing (RSFDGrC 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3641))

  • 1260 Accesses

Abstract

This study provides a comparison between the rough sets and probabilistic network algorithms in application to learning a pseudo-independent (PI) model, a type of probabilistic models hard to learn by common probabilistic learning algorithms based on search heuristics called single-link lookahead. The experimental result from this study shows that the rough sets algorithm outperforms the common probabilistic network method in learning a PI model. This indicates that the rough sets algorithm can apply to learning PI domains.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bazan, J.G., Szczuka, M.S., Wróblewski, J.: A new version of rough set exploration system. In: Alpigini, J.J., Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Zhong, N. (eds.). LNAI (LNCS), pp. 397–404. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Olshen, R., Stone, C.: Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Chickering, D., Geiger, D., Heckerman, D.: Learning Bayesian networks: search methods and experimental results. In: Proceedings of 5th Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, Ft. Lauderdale, pp. 112–128 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Cooper, G.F., Herskovits, E.: A Bayesian method for the induction of probabilistic networks from data. Machine Learning 9, 309–347 (1992)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Herskovits, E.H., Cooper, G.F.: Kutato: an entropy-driven system for construction of probabilistic expert systems from database. In: Proceedings of 6th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Cambridge, pp. 54–62 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Øhrn, A.: ROSETTA – Technical Reference Manual (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Johnson, D.S.: Approximation algorithms for combinatorial problems. Journal of Computer and System Science 9, 256–278 (1974)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Komorowski, J., Øhrn, A., Skowron, A.: The ROSETTA rough set software system. In: Klösgen, W., Zytkow, J. (eds.) Handbook of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kullback, S., Leibler, R.A.: On information and sufficiency. Annals of Mathematical Statistics 22, 79–86 (1951)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Lam, W., Bacchus, F.: Learning Bayesian networks: an approach based on the MDL principle. Computational Intelligence 10(3), 269–293 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee, J.: Foundation for the new algorithm learning pseudo-independent models. In: Proceedings of 8th European Conference on Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches on Reasoning with Uncertainty, Barcelona (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee, J., Xiang, Y.: Model complexity of pseudo-independent models. In: Proceedings of 16th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, Clearwater (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Øhrn, A.: ROSETTA, Computer Software. (1997), Available via World Wide, Web site http://rosetta.lcb.uu.se/

  14. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets – Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Pearl, J.: Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems: Networks of Plausible Inference. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, J.R.: Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1, 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rissanen, J.: Universal coding, information, prediction, and estimation. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory IT-30(4), 629–636 (1984)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Slezak, D., Wróblewski, J.: Order based genetic algorithms for the search of approximate entropy reducts. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing, Chongqing, China, pp. 308–311 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Spirtes, P., Glymour, C.: An algorithm for fast recovery of sparse causal graphs. Social Science Computer Review 9(1), 62–73 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Thornton, C.: Parity: the problem that won’t go away. In: McCalla, G. (ed.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 362–374. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Xiang, Y.: Towards understanding of pseudo-independent domains. In: Poster Proceedings of 10th International Symposium on Methodologies for Intelligent Systems, Charlotte (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Xiang, Y.: WEBWEAVR-III, Computer Software. (1998), Available via World Wide Web site http://www.cis.uoguelph.ca/~yxiang/

  23. Xiang, Y., Hu, J., Cercone, N., Hamilton, H.: Learning pseudo-independent models: analytical and experimental results. In: Hamilton, H. (ed.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 227–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Xiang, Y., Lee, J.: Local score computation in learning belief networks. In: Stroulia, E., Matwin, S. (eds.) Advances in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 152–161. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Xiang, Y., Lee, J., Cercone, N.: Parameterization of pseudo-independent models. In: Proceedings of 16th Florida Artificial Intelligence Research Society Conference, St. Augustine, pp. 521–525 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Xiang, Y., Lee, J., Cercone, N.: Towards better scoring metrics for pseudo-independent models. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Xiang, Y., Wong, S.K.M., Cercone, N.: Critical remarks on single link search in learning belief networks. In: Proceedings of 12th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, Portland, pp. 564–571 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Xiang, Y., Wong, S.K.M., Cercone, N.: A ‘microscopic’ study of minimum entropy search in learning decomposable Markov networks. Machine Learning 26(1), 65–92 (1997)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lee, JH. (2005). A Comparative Evaluation of Rough Sets and Probabilistic Network Algorithms on Learning Pseudo-independent Domains. In: Ślęzak, D., Wang, G., Szczuka, M., Düntsch, I., Yao, Y. (eds) Rough Sets, Fuzzy Sets, Data Mining, and Granular Computing. RSFDGrC 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3641. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11548669_59

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11548669_59

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28653-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31825-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics