Skip to main content

Subsumption in \(\mathcal{EL}\) w.r.t. Hybrid TBoxes

  • Conference paper
KI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (KI 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3698))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In the area of Description Logic (DL) based knowledge representation, two desirable features of DL systems have as yet been incompatible: firstly, the support of general TBoxes containing general concept inclusion (GCI) axioms, and secondly, non-standard inference services facilitating knowledge engineering tasks, such as build-up and maintenance of terminologies (TBoxes).

In order to make non-standard inferences available without sacrificing the convenience of GCIs, the present paper proposes hybrid TBoxes consisting of a pair of a general TBox \(\mathcal{F}\) interpreted by descriptive semantics, and a (possibly) cyclic TBox \(\mathcal{T}\) interpreted by fixpoint semantics. \(\mathcal{F}\) serves as a foundation of \(\mathcal{T}\) in the sense that the GCIs in \(\mathcal{F}\) define relationships between concepts used as atomic concept names in the definitions in \(\mathcal{T}\). Our main technical result is a polynomial time subsumption algorithm for hybrid \(\mathcal{EL}\)-TBoxes based on a polynomial reduction to subsumption w.r.t. cyclic \(\mathcal{EL}\)-TBoxes with fixpoint semantics. By virtue of this reduction, all non-standard inferences already available for cyclic \(\mathcal{EL}\)-TBoxes become available for hybrid ones.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Nardi, D., Brachmann, R.: An introduction to description logics. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 1–40. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rector, A., Nowlan, W., Glowinski, A.: Goals for concept representation in the galen project. In: Proc. of SCAMC, Washington, pp. 414–418 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Rector, A.: Medical informatics. In: The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, pp. 406–426. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Horrocks, I., Rector, A.L., Goble, C.A.: A description logic based schema for the classification of medical data. In: Proc. of KRDB 1996, CEUR-WS (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Horrocks, I.R.: Using an expressive description logic: FaCT or fiction? In: Proc. of KR 1998, pp. 636–645. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Haarslev, V., Möller, R.: RACER system description. In: Goré, R.P., Leitsch, A., Nipkow, T. (eds.) IJCAR 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2083, pp. 701–712. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Nebel, B.: Terminological cycles: Semantics and computational properties. In: Principles of Semantic Networks: Explorations in the Representation of Knowledge, pp. 331–361. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cohen, W.W., Hirsh, H.: Learning the classic description logic: Theoretical and experimental results. In: Proc. of KR 1994, pp. 121–133. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Frazier, M., Pitt, L.: CLASSIC learning. Machine Learning 25, 151–193 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Baader, F., Küsters, R.: Computing the least common subsumer and the most specific concept in the presence of cyclic \(\mathcal{ALN}\)-concept descriptions. In: Herzog, O. (ed.) KI 1998. LNCS, vol. 1504, pp. 129–140. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. McGuinness, D.: Explaining Reasoning in Description Logics. Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Borgida, A., McGuinness, D.L.: Asking queries about frames. In: Proc. of KR 1996, pp. 340–349. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Borgida, A., McGuinness, D.: Matching in description logics. Journal of Logic and Computation 9, 411–447 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Baader, F., Küsters, R., Molitor, R.: Computing least common subsumers in description logics with existential restrictions. In: Proc. of IJCAI 1999, pp. 96–101. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Brandt, S., Turhan, A.-Y.: Using non-standard inferences in description logics—what does it buy me? In: Proc. of KI-2001 Workshop on Applications of Description Logics (KIDLWS 2001), Number 44 in CEUR-WS (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Baader, F.: Least common subsumers and most specific concepts in a description logic with existential restrictions and terminological cycles. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2003, pp. 319–324. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baader, F.: Terminological cycles in a description logic with existential restrictions. In: Proc. of IJCAI 2003, pp. 325–330. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Tarski, A.: A lattice-theoretic fixpoint theorem and its applications. Pacific Journal of Mathematics 5, 285–309 (1955)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and—what else? In: Proc. of ECAI-2004, pp. 298–302. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cote, R., Rothwell, D., Palotay, J., Beckett, R., Brochu, L.: The systematized nomenclature of human and veterinary medicine. Technical report, Snomed International, Northfield, IL (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Spackman, K.: Normal forms for description logic expressions of clinical concepts in snomed rt. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Consortium, T.G.O.: Gene Ontology: Tool for the unification of biology. Nature Genetics 25, 25–29 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rector, A., Bechhofer, S., Goble, C.A., Horrocks, I., Nowlan, W.A., Solomon, W.D.: The grail concept modelling language for medical terminology. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 9, 139–171 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proc. of IJCAI-2005, Edinburgh, UK. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (2005) (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Brandt, S., Model, J. (2005). Subsumption in \(\mathcal{EL}\) w.r.t. Hybrid TBoxes. In: Furbach, U. (eds) KI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. KI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3698. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11551263_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11551263_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28761-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31818-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics