Skip to main content

Automatic MLP Weight Regularization on Mineralization Prediction Tasks

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems (KES 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3683))

  • 1087 Accesses

Abstract

Conventional neural network training methods attempt to find a set of values for the network weights by minimizing an error function using some gradient descent based technique. In order to achieve good generalization performance, it is usually necessary to introduce a regularization term into the error function to prevent weights becoming overly large. In the conventional approach, the regularization coefficient, which controls the degree to which large weights are penalized, must be optimized outside of the weight training procedure, and this is usually done by means of a cross-validation procedure in which some training examples are held out, thereby reducing the number of examples available for weight optimization. Bayesian methods provide a means of optimizing these coefficients within the weight optimization procedure. This paper reports on the application of Bayesian MLP techniques to the task of predicting mineralization potential from geoscientific data. Results demonstrate that the Bayesian approach results in similar maps to the conventional MLP approach, while avoiding the complex cross-validation procedure required by the latter.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Denison, D.G.T., Holmes, C.C., Mallick, B.K., Smith, A.F.M.: Bayesian methods for nonlinear classification and regression. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bishop, C.: Neural networks for pattern recognition. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bonham-Carter, G.F.: Geographic information systems for geoscientists: modeling with GIS. Pergamom Press, Oxford (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, W.M., Gedeon, T.D., Groves, D.I., Barnes, R.G.: Artificial neural networks: a new method for mineral prospectivity mapping. Journal of Australian Earth Sciences 47(4), 757–770 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Skabar, A.: Mineral Potential Mapping using Feed-Forward Neural Networks. In: Proceedings of International Joint Conference on Neural Networks, Portland, Oregon, pp. 1814–1819 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Skabar, A.: Optimization of MLP parameters on Mineral Potential Mapping Tasks. In: Proceedings of ICOTA: International Conference on Optimization: Techniques and Applications, Ballarat, Australia, December 9-11 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. MacKay, D.J.C.: A practical Bayesian framework for backpropagation networks. Neural Computation 4(3), 448–472 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Møller, M.: A scaled conjugate gradient algorithm for fast supervised learning. Neural Networks 6(4), 523–533 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skabar, A. (2005). Automatic MLP Weight Regularization on Mineralization Prediction Tasks. In: Khosla, R., Howlett, R.J., Jain, L.C. (eds) Knowledge-Based Intelligent Information and Engineering Systems. KES 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3683. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11553939_85

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11553939_85

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-28896-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31990-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics