Skip to main content

Quality Assurance in Performance: Evaluating Mono Benchmark Results

  • Conference paper
Quality of Software Architectures and Software Quality (QoSA 2005, SOQUA 2005)

Abstract

Performance is an important aspect of software quality. To prevent performance degradation during software development, performance can be monitored and software modifications that damage performance can be reverted or optimized. Regression benchmarking provides means for an automated monitoring of performance, yielding a list of software modifications potentially associated with performance changes. We focus on locating individual modifications as causes of individual performance changes and present three methods that help narrow down the list of modifications potentially associated with a performance change. We illustrate the entire process on a real world project.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Jeffries, R.E., Anderson, A., Hendrickson, C.: Extreme Programming Installed. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., Boston (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bulej, L., Kalibera, T., Tuma, P.: Repeated results analysis for middleware regression benchmarking. Performance Evaluation 60, 345–358 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bulej, L., Kalibera, T., Tuma, P.: Regression benchmarking with simple middleware benchmarks. In: Hassanein, H., Olivier, R.L., Richard, G.G., Wilson, L.L. (eds.) International Workshop on Middleware Performance, IPCCC 2004, pp. 771–776 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kalibera, T., Bulej, L., Tuma, P.: Generic environment for full automation of benchmarking. In: Beydeda, S., Gruhn, V., Mayer, J., Reussner, R., Schweiggert, F. (eds.) SOQUA/TECOS. LNI, GI vol. 58, pp. 125–132 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Novell, Inc.: The Mono Project (2005), http://www.mono-project.com

  6. ECMA: ECMA-335: Common Language Infrastructure (CLI). ECMA (European Association for Standardizing Information and Communication Systems), Geneva, Switzerland (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Distributed Systems Research Group: Mono regression benchmarking (2005), http://nenya.ms.mff.cuni.cz/projects/mono

  8. DOC Group: TAO performance scoreboard (2005), http://www.dre.vanderbilt.edu/stats/performance.shtml

  9. Prochazka, M., Madan, A., Vitek, J., Liu, W.: RTJBench: A Real-Time Java Benchmarking Framework. In: Component And Middleware Performance Workshop, OOPSLA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dillenseger, B., Cecchet, E.: CLIF is a Load Injection Framework. In: Workshop on Middleware Benchmarking: Approaches, Results, Experiences, OOPSLA 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Memon, A.M., Porter, A.A., Yilmaz, C., Nagarajan, A., Schmidt, D.C., Natarajan, B.: Skoll: Distributed continuous quality assurance. In: ICSE, pp. 459–468. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Courson, M., Mink, A., Marçais, G., Traverse, B.: An automated benchmarking toolset. In: Bubak, M., Afsarmanesh, H., Williams, R., Hertzberger, L.O. (eds.) HPCN-Europe 2000. LNCS, vol. 1823, pp. 497–506. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalibera, T., Bulej, L., Tuma, P.: Benchmark precision and random initial state. In: accepted for 2005 International Symposium on Performance Evaluation of Computer and Telecommunications Systems, SPECTS 2005 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Buble, A., Bulej, L., Tuma, P.: CORBA benchmarking: A course with hidden obstacles. In: IPDPS, p. 279. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hauswirth, M., Sweeney, P., Diwan, A., Hind, M.: The need for a whole-system view of performance. In: Component And Middleware Performance workshop, OOPSLA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gu, D., Verbrugge, C., Gagnon, E.: Code layout as a source of noise in JVM performance. In: Component And Middleware Performance Workshop, OOPSLA 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. The FreeBSD Documentation Project: FreeBSD Developers’ Handbook (2005), http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook

  18. Jain, R.: The Art of Computer Systems Performance Analysis: Techniques for Experimental Design, Measurement, Simulation, and Modeling. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Re, C., Vogels, W.: SciMark – C# (2004), http://rotor.cs.cornell.edu/SciMark/

  20. Pozo, R., Miller, B.: SciMark 2.0 benchmark (2005), http://math.nist.gov/scimark2/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kalibera, T., Bulej, L., Tuma, P. (2005). Quality Assurance in Performance: Evaluating Mono Benchmark Results. In: Reussner, R., Mayer, J., Stafford, J.A., Overhage, S., Becker, S., Schroeder, P.J. (eds) Quality of Software Architectures and Software Quality. QoSA SOQUA 2005 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3712. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11558569_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11558569_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29033-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32056-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics