Skip to main content

A Model of Multi-agent System Based on Policies and Contracts

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV (CEEMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3690))

  • 1241 Accesses

Abstract

Due to the dynamic nature of virtual organizations (VOs), it is necessary that the multi-agent system for VO formation and cooperation should be aware of the mutable business requirements or user’s preferences within VO environments and integrate these dynamic business requirements into its decision making process. We present a model of multi-agent system based on policies and contracts, in which the requirements for both the system and the individual agents can be defined dynamically by means of policies. On the one hand, at the system level, the duties and rights of roles can be specified or modified in terms of policies presented by the VO administrators. And on the other hand, role enacting agents are guided by policies defined by their owners. The policy and contract extended agent model (BGIPDC) is the core of the system, which is formally specified in this paper.

This work is supported by the National Grand Fundamental Research 973 Program of China under Grant No.2003CB317000.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vazquez-Salceda, J., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.: Organizing Multiagent Systems. In: JAAMAS. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2005) (forthcoming)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dignum, V., et al.: Formal Specification of Interaction in Agent Societies. In: Proceedings of FAAB 2002, pp. 37–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.: Contracts as legal institutions in organizations of autonomous agents. In: Proceedings of AAMAS 2004, pp. 948–955. IEEE, Inc., Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Dignum, F.: Autonomous Agents with Norms. Artificial Intelligence and Law 7, 69–79 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Tonti, G., Bradshaw, J.M., et al.: Semantic Web Languages for Policy Representation and Reasoning: A Comparison of KAoS, Rei, and Ponder. In: Proc. Second International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2003) (October 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Liao, B., et al.: Ontology-Based Conceptual Modeling of Policy-Driven Control Framework: Oriented to Multi-agent System for Web Services Management. In: Chi, C.-H., Lam, K.-Y. (eds.) AWCC 2004, vol. 3309, pp. 346–356. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Feltovich, P., et al.: Order and KAoS: Using policy to represent agent cultures. In: Proceedings of the AAMAS 2003 Workshop on Humans and Multi-Agent Systems, Melbourne, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rao, A.S., Georgeff, M.P.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI architecture. In: Proceedings of the KR 1991, pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fasli, M.: Interrelations between the BDI primitives: Towards heterogeneous agents. Cognitive Systems Research 4, 1–22 (2003a)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dignum, F., Kinny, D.N., Sonenberg, E.A.: Motivational Attitudes of Agents: On Desires Obligations and Norms. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Nawarecki, E. (eds.) CEEMAS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2296, pp. 61–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Lang, J., van der Torre, L., Weydert, E.: Utilitarian Desires. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 5(3), 329–363 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fasli, M.: From social agents to multi-agent systems: Preliminary report. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 111–121. Springer, Heidelberg (2003b)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Dastani, M.M., Dignum, V., Dignum, F.P.M.: Organizations and Normative Agents. In: Shafazand, H., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) EurAsia-ICT 2002. LNCS, vol. 2510, pp. 982–989. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., van der Torre, L.: BDIO-CTL: Obligations and the Specification of Agent Behavior. In: Proceedings of IJCAI 2003, pp. 1389–1390 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fasli, M.: On Commitments, Roles, and Obligations. In: Dunin-Keplicz, B., Nawarecki, E. (eds.) CEEMAS 2001. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2296, pp. 93–102. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liao, B., Gao, J. (2005). A Model of Multi-agent System Based on Policies and Contracts. In: Pěchouček, M., Petta, P., Varga, L.Z. (eds) Multi-Agent Systems and Applications IV. CEEMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3690. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11559221_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11559221_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29046-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31731-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics