Skip to main content

Enabling Business Process Interoperability Using Contract Workflow Models

  • Conference paper
On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE (OTM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3760))

Abstract

Business transactions are governed by legally established contracts. Contractual obligations are to be fulfilled by executing business processes of the involved parties. To enable this, contract terms and conditions need to be semantically mapped to process concepts and then analyzed for compliance with existing process models. To solve the problem, we propose a methodology that, using a layered contract ontology, deduces contract requirements into a high-level process description named Contract Workflow Model (CWM). By applying a set of transformation rules, the CWM is then compared for compliance with existing, executable process models. By the use of its concepts, the methodology enables comprehensive identification and evolution of requirements for interoperability of processes of the contracting parties.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Daskalopulu, A., Sergot, M.: The Representation of Legal Contracts. AI and Society, vol. 11(1,2). Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Griffel, M., et al.: Electronic Contracting with COSMOS - How to Establish, Negotiate and Execute Electronic Contracts on the Internet. In: Proceedings of the Int. Workshop EDOC 1998, San Diego (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Lee, R.: Toward Open Electronic Contracting. The International Journal of Electronic Markets 8(3) (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tan, Y.H., Thoen, W.: A Logical Model of Directed Obligations and Permissions to Support Electronic Contracting. The International Journal of Electronic Markets 10(1) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Karlapalem, K., Dani, A., Krishna, R.: A Framework for Modeling Electronic Contracts. In: Kunii, H.S., Jajodia, S., Sølvberg, A. (eds.) ER 2001. LNCS, vol. 2224, pp. 193–207. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Kabilan, V., Johannesson, P., Rugaimukamu, D.M.: Business Contract Obligation Monitor-ing through use of Multi-Tier Contract Ontology. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM-WS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2889, pp. 690–702. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Grosof, B., Poon, T.: SweetDeal: Representing Agent Contracts with exception using XML rules, Ontologies and process descriptions. In: Proceedings of the 12th International World Wide Web Conference (WWW 2003), Budapest, Hungary. ACM, New York (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alonso, G., et al.: WISE: Business-to-Busibness E-Commerce. In: Proceedings of 9th International Workshop on Research Issues and Data Engineering, Sidney, Australia. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Grefen, P., et al.: CrossFlow: Cross-organizational Workflow Management in Dynamic Virtual Enterprises. International Journal of Computer Systems 15(5) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Angelov, S., Grefen, P.: Support for B2B E-Contracting – The Process Perspective. In: IFIP Conference Proceedings of 5th Int. Conf. on Information Technology for Balanced Automation Systems in Manufacturing and Services (BASYS 2002), Mexico, p. 229. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  11. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Inheritance of Interorganizational Workflows to Enable Business-to-Business E-commerce. Electronic Commerce Research, vol. 2(3). Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. ICC International contract for sale of goods. ICC books (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ramberg, J.: ICC Guide to INCOTERMS 2000. Understanding and Practical Use; International Chamber of Commerce (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  14. IEEE’s Suggested Upper Merged Ontology, http://suo.ieee.org

  15. Kabilan, V., Zdravkovic, J., Johannesson, P.: Use of Multi-Tier Contract Ontology to deduce Contract Workflow Models for Enterprise Interoperability. In: Proceedings of 2nd INTEROP-EMOI open workshop on Enterprise Models and Interoperability collocated with CAISE 2005, Porto (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kabilan, V.: Contract Workflow Model Patterns Using BPMN. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Exploring Modeling Methods in Systems Analysis and Design (EMMSAD 2005), co located with Caise 2005, Porto (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. White, S.: Business Process Modeling Notation, version 1.0. Business Management Initiative (May 2004), http://www.bpmi.org

  18. BEA, IBM, Microsoft, SAP and Siebel. Business Process Execution Language for Web Services (BPEL) (June 9, 2004), http://www-106.ibm.com/developerworks/library/ws-bpel/

  19. Jablonski, S.: A Software Architecture for Workflow Management Systems. In: Proceedings of the Ninth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (DEXA 1998), Vienna, Austria, August 1998, pp. 739–744. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Rausch-Scott, S.: TriGSflow – Workflow Management Based on Active Object-Oriented Database Systems and Extended Transaction Mechanisms. PhD Thesis, Univ. at Linz (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bernstein, P., Hadzilacos, V., Goodman, N.: Concurrency Control and Recovery in Data-base Systems. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia-Molina, H.: Modeling Long-Running Activities as Nested Sagas. IEEE Data Engineering Bulletin 14(1), 14–18 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  23. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Inheritance in Workflows. An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change. Theoretical Computer Science 270(1-2), 125–203 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Groote, J.F., Vaandrager, F.: An Efficient Algorithm for Branching Bisimulation and Stuttering Equivalence. In: Proceedings 17th ICALP. LNCS, vol. 443, pp. 626–638. Springer, Heidelberg (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zdravkovic, J., Kabilan, V. (2005). Enabling Business Process Interoperability Using Contract Workflow Models. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: CoopIS, DOA, and ODBASE. OTM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3760. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575771_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575771_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29736-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32116-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics