Abstract
Nowadays, ontology is applied as an integral part of many applications in several domains, especially in the world of law. The ontology based judicial support system is believed as a useful tool to support, for example, the legal argumentation assistant and legal decision taking in court. The privacy case analyzer is considered as one of the most interesting applications of ontology based privacy judicial support systems. The efficiency of privacy case analyzers depend on several factors such as how to tackle the problem of linking cases to legislations, how to imply the guidance of privacy principles, and how to improve the extraction of cases. This paper addresses those items and describes the research issues that will be investigated challenges of ontology based judicial support systems.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontologies. Knowledge Acquisition 5(2), 199–220 (1993)
Gruber, T.R.: Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing. In: Workshop on Formal Ontology, Padova, Italy (1992)
De Leenheer, P., De Moor, A.: Context-driven Disambiguation in Ontology Elicitation. In: Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J. (eds.) Context and Ontologies: Theory, Practice and Applications. AAAI Technical Report WS-05-01, pp. 17–24. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2005)
Meersman, R.: Ontologies and Databases: More than a Fleeting Resemblance. In: D’Atri, A., Missikoff, M. (eds.) OES/SEO 2001 Rome Workshop. Luiss Pub. (2001)
Holland, J.A., Webb, J.S.: Learning legal rules. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2003)
Woolf, L.: substantial change of civil court rule in UK (1999)
Summers, R.: Two types of substantive reasons: the core of a theory of common law justification. 63 Cornell Law Review 707 (1978)
Verheyden, P., De Bo, J., Meersman, R.: Semantically unlocking database content through ontology-based mediation. In: Bussler, C.J., Tannen, V., Fundulaki, I. (eds.) SWDB 2004. LNCS, vol. 3372, pp. 109–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
De Leenheer, P., Meersman, R.: Towards a formal foundation of DOGMA Ontology Part I: Lexon Base and Concept Definition Server. Technical Report STAR-2005-06, STARLab, Brussel (2005)
Dumortier, J., Goemans, C.: Roadmap for European legal research in privacy and identity management. K.U. Leuven (2003)
Halpin, T.A.: Information Modeling and Relational Databases: From Conceptual Analysis to Logical Design. Morgan Kaufman Publishers, San Francisco (2001)
Valente, A., Breuker, J.: Ontology: the missing link between legal theory and AI & law. In: Soeteman, A. (ed.) Legal knowledge based systems JURIX 1994: Lelystad, Koninklijke Vermande (1994)
Niblett, B.: Computer science and law: an introductory discussion. In: Niblett, B. (ed.) computer science and law: an advanced course. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Tang, Y., Meersman, R. (2005). Judicial Support Systems: Ideas for a Privacy Ontology-Based Case Analyzer. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z., Herrero, P. (eds) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems 2005: OTM 2005 Workshops. OTM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3762. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_100
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11575863_100
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29739-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32132-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)