Skip to main content

Modelling Power and Trust for Knowledge Distribution: An Argumentative Approach

  • Conference paper
MICAI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence (MICAI 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3789))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Knowledge and Information distribution, which is one of the main processes in Knowledge Management, is greatly affected by power explicit relations, as well as by implicit relations like trust. Making decisions about whether to deliver or not a specific piece of information to users on the basis of a rationally justified procedure under potentially conflicting policies for power and trust relations is indeed a challenging problem. In this paper we model power relations, as well as delegation and trust, in terms of an argumentation formalism, in such a way that a dialectical process works as a decision core, which is used in combination with the existing knowledge and an information distribution system. A detailed example is presented and an implementation reported.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Liebowitz, J., Wilcox, L.: Knowledge Management. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Horibe, F.: Managing Knowledge Workers. John Wiley and Sons, Chichester (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Liebowitz, J., Beckman, T.: Knowledge Organizations. St. Lucie Press (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Atkinson, R., Court, R., Ward, J.: The knowledge economy: Knowledge producers and knowledge users. The New Economic Index (1998), http://www.neweconomyindex.org/

  5. Gelati, J., Governatori, G., Rotolo, A., Sartor, G.: Declarative power, representation and mandate: A formal analysis. In: Proceedings of 15th Conf. on Legal Knowledge and Inf. Systems, pp. 41–52. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: REGRET: reputation in gregarious societies. In: Müller, J.P., Andre, E., Sen, S., Frasson, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 194–195. ACM Press, Montreal (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Mui, L.: Computational Models of Trust and Reputation: Agents, Evolutionary Games, and Social Networks. PhD thesis, MIT (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Borghoff, U., Pareschi, R.: Information Technology for Knowledge Management. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brena, R., Aguirre, J.L., Trevino, A.C.: Just-in-time information and knowledge: Agent technology for km bussiness process. In: Proc. of the 2001 IEEE Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, Tucson, Arizona. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chesñevar, C., Brena, R., Aguirre, J.: Knowledge distribution in large organizations using defeasible logic programming. In: Kégl, B., Lapalme, G. (eds.) Canadian AI 2005. LNCS, vol. 3501, pp. 244–256. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Aguirre, J., Brena, R., Cantu, F.: Multiagent-based knowledge networks. Expert Systems with Applications 20, 65–75 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. García, A., Simari, G.: Defeasible Logic Programming: An Argumentative Approach. Theory and Practice of Logic Programming 4, 95–138 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Simari, G., Loui, R.: A Mathematical Treatment of Defeasible Reasoning and its Implementation. Art. Intelligence 53, 125–157 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Wasson, G., Humphrey, M.: Toward explicit policy management for virtual organizations. In: IEEE Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Network (POLICY 2003), pp. 173–182 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norman, T., Preece, A., Chalmers, S., Jennings, N., Luck, M., Dang, V., Nguyen, T., Deora, V., Shao, J., Gray, W., Fiddian, N.: Conoise: Agent-based formation of virtual organisations. In: Proc. of the 23rd Intl. Conf. on Innovative Techniques and Applications of AI, pp. 353–366 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: Jade - a fipa-compliant agent framework. In: Proceedings of PAAM 1999, London (1999)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chesñevar, C.I., Brena, R.F., Aguirre, J.L. (2005). Modelling Power and Trust for Knowledge Distribution: An Argumentative Approach. In: Gelbukh, A., de Albornoz, Á., Terashima-Marín, H. (eds) MICAI 2005: Advances in Artificial Intelligence. MICAI 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3789. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11579427_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11579427_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-29896-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31653-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics