Skip to main content

Supervised Learning of an Ontology Alignment Process

  • Conference paper
Professional Knowledge Management (WM 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3782))

Abstract

Ontology alignment is a crucial task to enable interoperability among different agents. However, the complexity of the alignment task especially for large ontologies requires automated support for the creation of alignment methods. When looking at current ontology alignment methods one can see that they are either not optimized for given ontologies or their optimization by machine learning means is mostly restricted to the extensional definition of ontologies. With APFEL (Alignment Process Feature Estimation and Learning) we present a machine learning approach that explores the user validation of initial alignments for optimizing alignment methods. The methods are based on extensional and intensional ontology definitions. Core to APFEL is the idea of a generic alignment process, the steps of which may be represented explicitly. APFEL then generates new hypotheses for what might be useful features and similarity assessments and weights them by machine learning approaches. APFEL compares favorably in our experiments to competing approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Doan, A., Domingos, P., Halevy, A.: Learning to match the schemas of data sources: A multistrategy approach. VLDB Journal 50, 279–301 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Klein, M.: Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. In: Gomez-Perez, A. (ed.) Workshop on Ontology and Information Sharing, IJCAI 2001, Seattle, USA (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bisson, G.: Why and how to define a similarity measure for object based representation systems. Towards Very Large Knowledge Bases, 236–246 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 59, 983–1024 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284, 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Levenshtein, I.V.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory (1966)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fellbaum, C.: (WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castano, S.V., Antonellis, M.G.D., Fugini, B., Pernici, C.: Schema analysis: Techniques and applications. ACM Trans. Systems 23, 286–333 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ehrig, M., Sure, Y.: Ontology mapping - an integrated approach. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 76–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Do, H., Rahm, E.: COMA - a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proceedings of the 28th VLDB Conference, Hong Kong, China (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hughes, T.: Information interpretation and integration conference (2004), http://www.atl.external.lmco.com/projects/ontology/i3con.html

  13. Do, H., Melnik, S., Rahm, E.: Comparison of schema matching evaluations. In: Proc. of the Second International Workshop on Web Databases (German Informatics Society) (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dhamankar, R., Lee, Y., Doan, A., Halevy, A., Domingos, P.: iMAP: discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In: Proc. of the, ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Paris, France, pp. 383–394 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Euzenat, J., Valtchev, P.: Similarity-based ontology alignment in owl-lite. In: Proc. of ECAI 2004, Valencia, Spain, pp. 333–337 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ehrig, M., Sure, Y., Staab, S. (2005). Supervised Learning of an Ontology Alignment Process. In: Althoff, KD., Dengel, A., Bergmann, R., Nick, M., Roth-Berghofer, T. (eds) Professional Knowledge Management. WM 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3782. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11590019_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30465-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31620-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics