Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantics and Pragmatics for Agent Communication

  • Conference paper
Progress in Artificial Intelligence (EPIA 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3808))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

For the successful management of interactions in open multi-agent systems, a social framework is needed to complement a standard semantics and interaction protocols for agent communication. In this paper a rights-based framework in which interaction protocols and conversation policies acquire their meaning is presented. Rights improve interaction and facilitate social action in multi-agent domains. Rights allow agents enough freedom, and at the same time constrain them (prohibiting specific actions). A general framework for agent communication languages (ACLs) is proposed, defining a set of performatives (semantics) and showing why a set of conversation policies to guide agent’s interactions (pragmatics) is needed. Finally, we show how it is possible to model interaction protocols within a rights-based normative open MAS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, E.: Rights and argumentation in open multi-agent systems. Artificial Intelligence Review 21, 3–24 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Austin, J.L.: How to do Things with Words. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1962)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, P., Levesque, H.: Intention is Choice with Commitment. Artificial Intelligence 42, 213–261 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Cost, R.S., Chen, Y., Finin, T., Labrou, Y., Peng, Y.: Modeling agent conversations with colored petri nets. In: Workshop on Specifying and Implementing Conversation Policies, Third International Conference on Autonomous Agents (Agents 1999), Seattle (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dastani, M., van der Ham, J., Dignum, F.: Communication for goal directed agents. In: Huget, M.P. (ed.) Communication in Multiagent Systems - Agent Communication Languages and Conversation Policies. LNCS, vol. 2003, pp. 239–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dastani, M., Riemsdijk, M., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.J.: A programming language for cognitive agents: Goal-directed 3apl. In: Dastani, M., Dix, J., Fallah-Seghrouchni, A.E. (eds.) Programming Multi-Agent Systems. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3037, pp. 111–130. Springer, Berlin (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Emerson, E.A.: Temporal and modal logic. In: van Leeuwen, J. (ed.) Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 995–1072. North Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Esteva, M., Rodriguez, J.A., Sierra, C., Garcia, P., Arcos, J.L.: On the formal specification of electronic institutions. In: Dignum, F., Sierra, C. (eds.) Agent-mediated Electronic Commerce (The European AgentLink Perspective). LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1191, pp. 126–147. Springer, Berlin (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. FIPA ACL: FIPA Communicative Act Library Specification (2002), http://www.fipa.org/repository/aclspecs.html

  10. Fornara, N., Colombetti, M.: A commitment-based approach to agent communication. Applied Artificial Intelligence 18, 853–866 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fornara, N., Vigano, F., Colombetti, M.: Agent communication and institutional reality. In: van Eijk, R.M., Huget, M.-P., Dignum, F.P.M. (eds.) AC 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3396, pp. 1–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Greaves, M., Holmback, H., Bradshaw, J.: What is a Conversation Policy? In: Dignum, F., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication, pp. 118–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Kagal, L., Finin, T., Joshi, A.: A policy language for a pervasive computing environment. In: IEEE 4th International Workshop on Policies for Distributed Systems and Networks (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Manna, Z., Pnueli, A.: The Temporal Logic of Reactive and Concurrent Systems. Springer, Berlin (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Norman, T.J., Sierra, C., Jennings, N.R.: Rights and commitment in multi-agent agreements. In: Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 222–229 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rao, A., Georgeff, M.: Modeling rational agents within a BDI-architecture. In: Allen, J., Fikes, R., Sandewall, E. (eds.) 2nd International Conference on Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning (KR 1991), pp. 473–484. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Francisco (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rovatsos, M., Nickles, M., Weiss, G.: Interaction is Meaning: A new Model for Communication in Open Systems. In: Proceedings of the Second International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2003), Melbourne, Australia (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Searle, J.R.: Speech Acts. In: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Singh, M.P.: A social semantics for agent communication languages. In: Dignum, F.P.M., Greaves, M. (eds.) Issues in Agent Communication. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1916. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. van der Torre, L.: Contextual deontic logic: Normative agents, violations and independence. Ann. Math. Artif. Intell. 37, 33–63 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. van der Torre, L., Hulstijn, J., Dastani, M., Broersen, J.: Specifying multiagent organizations. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3065, pp. 243–257. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Wooldridge, M.: Semantic issues in the verification of agent communication languages. Journal of Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 3, 9–31 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Computing, City University, EC1V 0HB, London, UK

    Rodrigo Agerri & Eduardo Alonso

Authors
  1. Rodrigo Agerri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Eduardo Alonso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Portugal Telecom Inovação (PTI), Centro de Informatica e Sistemas da Universidade de Coimbra (CISUC),  

    Carlos Bento

  2. Department of Informatics Engineering, Coimbra University, Portugal

    Amílcar Cardoso

  3. Centre of Human Language Technology and Bioinformatics, University of Beira Interior, 6201-001, Covilhã, Portugal

    Gaël Dias

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Agerri, R., Alonso, E. (2005). Semantics and Pragmatics for Agent Communication. In: Bento, C., Cardoso, A., Dias, G. (eds) Progress in Artificial Intelligence. EPIA 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3808. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11595014_52

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11595014_52

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30737-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-31646-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation