Skip to main content

Best Web Service Selection Based on the Decision Making Between QoS Criteria of Service

  • Conference paper
Embedded Software and Systems (ICESS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 3820))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1074 Accesses

Abstract

Recently, extensive studies have been carried out on web service standards because of the necessity of developing large-scale applications in open environments. In particular, they enable services to be dynamically bound. However, current techniques fail to address the critical problem of selecting the right service instances. Service selection should be determined based on customer preferences and service level. We propose a best web service selection method which helps to find a service provider providing the optimal quality. Web service selection process was described with multi-criteria decision making approach(e.g. PROMETHEE) on the basis of evaluated values of qualities and the defined service level. The PROMETHEE method has advantages in comparison with the others(e.g. MAUT, AHP) as follows. First, the PROMETHEE method classifies alternatives which is difficult to be compared because of a trade-off relation of evaluation standards as non-comparable alternatives. Second, the PROMETHEE method is different from the AHP method in that there’s no need to perform a pair-wise comparison again when comparative alternatives are added or deleted. Therefore, this method is a suitable approach in the web service selection problem. Because the problem has a lot of quality parameters which are measured and evaluated at the same time and frequently induces a drop of another quality parameter by the improvement of one quality attribute. Consequently, our approach enables applications to be dynamically configured at runtime in a manner that continually adapts to the preferences of the customers. We verify our approach through case study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rogers, S.: Web Services Software 2004-2008 Forecast, IDC (April 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clark, M.: UDDI weather report (November 2001), Available online: http://www.webservicesarchitect.com/content/articles/clark04.asp

  3. Hung, P.C.K.: Web Services Discovery Based on the Trade-off between Quality and Cost of Service: A Token-based Approach. In: The ACM SIGecom Exchanges, vol. 4.2, pp. 20–26 (September 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Day, J., Deters, R.: Selecting the Best Web Service. In: Proceedings of the 14th Annual IBM Centers for Advanced Studies Conference (CASCON), October 2004, pp. 293–307 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Min, J.H., Song, Y.M.: A Comparison of MAUT, AHP and PROMETHEE for Multicriteria Decisions. In: Proceedings of the Korean Operations and Management Science Society Conference, pp. 229–232 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bennett, K.H., et al.: A Broker Architecture for Integrating Data Using a Web Services Environment. In: Orlowska, M.E., Weerawarana, S., Papazoglou, M.P., Yang, J. (eds.) ICSOC 2003. LNCS, vol. 2910, pp. 409–422. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Ullman, D.G.: The Ideal Engineering Decision Support System, Technical paper, Robust Decisions Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Saaty, T.: Decision Making for Leaders. RWS Publications (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brans, J., Vincke, P.: A Preference Ranking Organization method(The PROMETHEE Method for Multiple Criteria Decision-Making). Management Science 31(6), 647–656 (1985)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Geldermann, J., Rentz, O.: Multi-criteria analysis for the assessment of environmen-tally relevant installations. Journal of Industrial Ecology (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Bissel, T., Bogen, M., Bonkowski, C., Hadamschek, V.: Service Level Management with Agent Technology. In: Proceedings of the TARENA Networking Conference, pp. 831–841 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dan, A., Ludwig, H., Pacifici, G.: Web Services Differentiation with Service Level Agreements, White Paper, IBM Corporation (May 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ran, S.: A Model for Web Services Discovery With QoS. ACM SIGecom Ex-changes 4(1), 1–10 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. NCA, A Study on Technical Trends and Deployment Strategies of Web Service Quality Management, National Computerization Agency Research Report (December 2003), Available online: http://www.nca.or.kr/eindex.htm

  15. Yu, T., Lin, K.-J.: The Design of QoS Broker Algorithms for QoS-Capable Web Services. In: Proceedings of the e-Technology, e-Commerce and e-Service Conference, pp. 17–24 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Seo, YJ., Jeong, HY., Song, YJ. (2005). Best Web Service Selection Based on the Decision Making Between QoS Criteria of Service. In: Yang, L.T., Zhou, X., Zhao, W., Wu, Z., Zhu, Y., Lin, M. (eds) Embedded Software and Systems. ICESS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3820. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11599555_39

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11599555_39

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30881-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32297-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics