Skip to main content

A Simple Graph-Theoretic Model for Selfish Restricted Scheduling

  • Conference paper
Internet and Network Economics (WINE 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3828))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2075 Accesses

Abstract

In this work, we introduce and study a simple, graph-theoretic model for selfish scheduling among m non-cooperative users over a collection of nmachines; however, each user is restricted to assign its unsplittable load to one from a pair of machines that are allowed for the user. We model these bounded interactions using an interaction graph, whose vertices and edges are the machines and the users, respectively. We study the impact of our modeling assumptions on the properties of Nash equilibria in this new model. The main findings of our study are outlined as follows:

– We prove, as our main result, that the parallel links graph is the best-case interaction graph – the one that minimizes expected makespan of the standard fully mixed Nash equilibrium – among all 3-regular interaction graphs. The proof employs a graph-theoretic lemma about orientations in 3-regular graphs, which may be of independent interest.

– We prove a lower bound on Coordination Ratio[16] – a measure of the cost incurred to the system due to the selfish behavior of the users. In particular, we prove that there is an interaction graph incurring Coordination Ratio \({\it \Omega} \left( \frac{\log n} {\log \log n} \right)\). This bound is shown for pure Nash equilibria.

– We present counterexample interaction graphs to prove that a fully mixed Nash equilibrium may sometimes not exist at all. Moreover, we prove properties of the fully mixed Nash equilibrium for complete bipartite graphs and hypercube graphs.

This work has been partially supported by the DFG-Sonderforschungsbereich 376 Massive Parallelität: Algorithmen, Entwurfsmethoden, Anwendungen, by the VEGA grant No. 2/3164/23, by the IST Program of the European Union under projects FLAGS (contract number IST-2001-33116) and DELIS (contract number 001907), and by research funds at University of Cyprus.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Richter, Y., Tsur, D.: Tradeoffs in Worst-Case Equilibria. In: Solis-Oba, R., Jansen, K. (eds.) WAOA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2909, pp. 41–52. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E., Nanavati, A.: Coordination Mechanisms. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 345–357. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Czumaj, A., Vöcking, B.: Tight Bounds for Worst-Case Equilibria. In: Proceedings of the 13th Annual ACM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, pp. 413–420 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Even-Dar, A., Kesselman, A., Mansour, Y.: Convergence Time to Nash Equilibria. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 502–513. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Feldmann, R., Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Monien, B., Rode, M.: Nashification and the Coordination Ratio for a Selfish Routing Game. In: Baeten, J.C.M., Lenstra, J.K., Parrow, J., Woeginger, G.J. (eds.) ICALP 2003. LNCS, vol. 2719, pp. 514–526. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Fischer, S., Vöcking, B.: A Counterexample to the Fully Mixed Nash Equilibrium Conjecture. Technical Report, RWTH Aachen (2005), http://aib.informatik.rwth-aachen.de/2005/2005-11.ps.gz

  7. Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The Structure and Complexity of Nash Equilibria for a Selfish Routing Game. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 123–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B.: Computing Nash Equilibria for Scheduling on Restricted Parallel Links. In: Proceedings of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 613–622 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B.: The Price of Anarchy for Polynomial Social Cost. In: Fiala, J., Koubek, V., Kratochvíl, J. (eds.) MFCS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3153, pp. 574–585. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Rode, M.: Nash Equilibria in Discrete Routing Games with Convex Latency Functions. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 645–657. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Spirakis, P.: Extreme Nash Equilibria. In: Blundo, C., Laneve, C. (eds.) ICTCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2841, pp. 1–20. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Gottlob, G., Greco, G., Scarcello, F.: Pure Nash Equilibria: Hard and Easy Games. In: Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Theoretical Aspects of Rationality and Knowledge, pp. 215–230 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kakade, S., Kearns, M., Langford, J., Ortiz, L.: Correlated Equilibria in Graphical Games. In: Proceedings of the 4th ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce, pp. 42–47 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kearns, M., Littman, M., Singh, S.: Graphical Models for Game Theory. In: Proceedings of the 17th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 253–260 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Koller, D., Milch, B.: Multi-Agent Influence Diagrams for Representing and Solving Games. Games and Economic Behavior 45(1), 181–221 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.H.: Worst-Case Equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. La Mura, P.: Game Networks. In: Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pp. 335–342 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Littman, M., Kearns, M., Singh, S.: An Efficient Exact Algorithm for Solving Tree-Structured Graphical Games. In: Proceedings of the 15th Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems – Natural and Synthetic, pp. 817–823 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Rode, M., Spirakis, P., Vrto, I.: Which is the Worst-Case Nash equilibrium? In: Rovan, B., Vojtáš, P. (eds.) MFCS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2747, pp. 551–561. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The Price of Selfish Routing. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 510–519 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nash, J.F.: Equilibrium Points in N-Person Games. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 36, 48–49 (1950)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2005 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Elsässer, R., Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B. (2005). A Simple Graph-Theoretic Model for Selfish Restricted Scheduling. In: Deng, X., Ye, Y. (eds) Internet and Network Economics. WINE 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3828. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11600930_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11600930_20

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-30900-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32293-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics