Abstract
Medical errors are now recognized as a major cause of untimely deathsor other adverse medical outcomes. To reduce the number of medical errors, the Medical Safety Project at the University of Massachusetts is exploring using a process programming language to define medical processes, a requirements elicitation framework for specifying important medical properties, and finite-state verification tools to evaluate whether the process definitions adhere to these properties. In this paper, we describe our experiences to date. Although our findings are preliminary, we have found that defining and evaluating processes helps to detect weaknesses in these processes and leads to improved medical processes definitions.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Cheung, S.C., Giannakopoulou, D., Kramer, J.: Verification of liveness properties using compositional reachability analysis. In: Sixth European Software Engineering Conference and Fifth ACM SIGSOFT Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, Zurich, Switzerland, pp. 227–243 (1997)
Cobleigh, J.M., Clarke, L.A., Osterweil, L.J.: Verifying properties of process definitions. In: ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, Portland, OR, pp. 96–101 (2000)
Corbett, J.C., Dwyer, M.B., Hatcliff, J.: Robby: Bandera: A source-level interface for model checking Java programs. In: 22nd International Conference on Software Engineering, Limerick, Ireland, pp. 762–765 (2000)
Dwyer, M.B., Clarke, L.A., Cobleigh, J.M., Naumovich, G.: Flow analysis for verifying properties of concurrent software systems. ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology 14(3), 359–430 (2004)
Holzmann, G.J.: The model checker SPIN. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 23(5), 279–294 (1997)
Institute of Medicine: Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century, pp. 23–38. The National Academies Press, Washington DC (2001)
Kohn, L.T., Corrigan, J.M., Donaldson, M.S. (eds.): To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System. National Academy Press, Washington DC (1999)
Lerner, B.S.: Verifying process models built using parameterized state machines. In: ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Software Testing and Analysis, Boston, MA, pp. 274–284 (2004)
Magee, J., Kramer, J.: Concurrency: State Models & Java Programs. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1999)
Smith, R.L., Avrunin, G.S., Clarke, L.A., Osterweil, L.J.: PROPEL: An approach supporting property elucidation. In: 24th International Conference on Software Engineering, Orlando, FL, pp. 11–21 (2002)
Wise, A.: Little-JIL 1.0 language report. Technical report (UM-CS-1998-024), Department of Computer Science, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, MA (1998)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Clarke, L.A. et al. (2006). Process Programming to Support Medical Safety: A Case Study on Blood Transfusion. In: Li, M., Boehm, B., Osterweil, L.J. (eds) Unifying the Software Process Spectrum. SPW 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3840. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11608035_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11608035_29
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-31112-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32450-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)