Skip to main content

Modeling Non-linear Common-Pool Resource Experiments with Boundedly Rational Agents

  • Conference paper
Multi-Agent-Based Simulation VI (MABS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 3891))

Abstract

This paper presents a model of non-linear common-pool resource experiments with boundedly rational agents. The model is based on data of experiments with and without communication and reproduces individual and not only aggregated data. It is part of a framework for modeling economic experiments. The agents exhibit bounded rationality in the sense that they use simple heuristics and simple learning processes in an aspiration adaptation process, and base their decisions on norms and “’emotions”. A major objective of this kind of modeling is to implement agents in a way that makes it possible for humans to identify with agent behaviour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Demsetz, H.: Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57, 347 (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hardin, G.: The tragedy of the commons. Science 162, 1243–1248 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ostrom, E. (ed.): Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ostrom, E., Gardner, R., Walker, J. (eds.): Rules, games, and common-pool resources. The University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deadman, P.J., Schlager, E., Gimblett, R.: Simulating Common Pool Resource Management Experiments with Adaptive Agents Employing Alternate Communication Routines. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 3 (2000), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/JASSS/3/2/2.htm

  6. Duffy, J.: Learning to speculate: Experiments with artificial and real agents. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 25 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Forno, A.D., Merlone, U.: From classroom experiments to computer code. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 7 (2004), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/7/3/2.html

  8. Gigerenzer, G., Selten, R. (eds.): Bounded Rationality. The Adaptive Toolbox. The MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Selten, R.: What is bounded rationality? In: Gigerenzer, G., Selten, R. (eds.) [8], ch. 2, pp. 13–36. MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ostrom, E.: Toward a behavioral theory linking trust, reciprocity, and reputation. In: [23], ch. 2, pp. 19–79 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ebenhöh, E., Pahl-Wostl, C.: Agent-based modelling with boundedly rational agents. In: Rennard, J.P. (ed.) Handbook of Research on Nature Inspired Computing for Economy and Management, Idea Group (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  12. McClintock, C.G.: Social motivation - a set of propositions. Behavioral Science 17, 438–454 (1972)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Andreoni, J.: Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy 97, 1447–1458 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Gerard, H.B., Conolley, E.S.: Conformity. In: McClintock, C.G. (ed.) Experimental Social Psychology. Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, pp. 237–263 (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Simon, H.A.: Models of Bounded Rationality. 3. The MIT Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fehr, E., Schmidt, K.M.: A theory of fairness, competition, and cooperation. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 817–868 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cox, J.C.: How to identify trust and reciprocity. Games and Economic Behavior 46, 260–281 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. McCabe, K.A., Smith, V.L.: Goodwill accounting and the process of exchange. In: [8], ch. 18, pp. 319–340.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Nooteboom, B., Six, F. (eds.): The Trust Process in Organizations, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham UK, Northampton MA USA (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Cook, K.S., Cooper, R.M.: Experimental studies of cooperation, trust, and social exchange. In: [23], ch. 8, pp. 209–244.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Albers, W.: Prominence Theory as a Tool to Model Boundedly Rational Decisions. In: [8], ch. 17, pp. 297–317.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moss, S., Edmonds, B.: Sociology and simulation: Statistical and qualitative cross-validation. American Journal of Sociology 110, 1095–1131 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ostrom, E., Walker, J. (eds.): Trust and Reciprocity. Russel Sage Foundation Series on Trust, vol. VI. Russel Sage Foundation, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ebenhöh, E. (2006). Modeling Non-linear Common-Pool Resource Experiments with Boundedly Rational Agents. In: Sichman, J.S., Antunes, L. (eds) Multi-Agent-Based Simulation VI. MABS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 3891. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11734680_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11734680_10

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33380-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33381-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics