Skip to main content

Readability Applied to Information Retrieval

  • Conference paper
Advances in Information Retrieval (ECIR 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 3936))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Readability refers to all characteristics of a document that contribute to its ‘ease of understanding or comprehension due to the style of writing’ [1]. The readability of a text is dependent on a number of factors, including but not constrained to; its legibility, syntactic difficulty, semantic difficulty and the organization of the text [2]. As many as 228 variables were found to influence the readability of a text in Gray and Leary’s seminal study [2]. These variables were classified as relating to document content, style, format or, features of organization.

Enterprise Ireland Grant No. SC/2003/0255.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Klare, G.: The Measurement of Readability, Iowa State University Press (1963)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chall, J.: Readability: An Appraisal of Research and Application. Number 34 in Bureau of Educational Research Monographs, The Bureau of Educational Research Ohio State University (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Entin, E., Klare, G.: Relationships of measures of interest, prior knowledge, and readabilty to comprehension of expository passages. Advances in reading/language research 3, 9–38 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Schiefele, U.: Topic interest and free recall of expository text. Learning and Individual Differences 8(2), 141–160 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Borlund, P.: The concept of relevance in ir. JASIST 54(10), 913–925 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cool, C., Belkin, N., Frieder, O., Kantor, P.: Characteristics of text affecting relevance judgments. In: Proceedings of the 14th Natioal Online Meeting, pp. 74–84. Learned Information, Inc (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barry, C.L., Schamber, L.: Users’ criteria for relevance evaluation: a crosssituational comparison. Information Processing Management 34(2-3), 219–236 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kintsch, W.: Learning from text. American Psychologist 49, 294–303 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Flesch, R.: A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology 32, 221–233 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Dale, E., Chall, J.: A formula for predicting readability. Educational Research Bulletin 27, 11–20 (1948)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Gunning, R.: The Technique of Clear Writing, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fry, E.: Fry’s readability graph: Clarifications, validity, and extension to level 17. Journal of Reading 21(3), 242–252 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wolfe, M., Schreiner, M., Rehder, B., Laham, D., Kinstch, W., Landauer, T.: Learning from text: Matching readers and texts by latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes 25, 309–336 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dufty, D.F., McNamara, D., Louwerse, M., Cai, Z., Graesser, A.C.: Automatic evaluation of aspects of document quality. In: SIGDOC 2004: Proceedings of the 22nd annual international conference on Design of communication, pp. 14–16. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Collins-Thompson, K., Callan, J.: Predicting reading difficulty with statistical language models: Research articles. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 56(13), 1448–1462 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Finn, A., Kushmeric, N.: Learning to classify documents according to genre. In: IJCAI 2003 Workshop on Computational Approaches to Style Analysis and Synthesis (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Talburt, J.: The flesch index: An easily programmable readability analysis algorithm. In: SIGDOC 1985: Proceedings of the 4th annual international conference on Systems documentation, pp. 114–122. ACM Press, New York (1985)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kane, L., Carthy, J., Dunnion, J. (2006). Readability Applied to Information Retrieval. In: Lalmas, M., MacFarlane, A., Rüger, S., Tombros, A., Tsikrika, T., Yavlinsky, A. (eds) Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3936. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11735106_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11735106_56

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-33347-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-33348-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics