Abstract
Architecture describes the organizational structure of a system including components, interactions, and constraints. Reusable components, units of software systems, have been considered to support a considerable improvement in reducing development costs and time to market because their interfaces and functionality are explicitly defined. Instead of reusing an individual component, however, it is much more advantageous to reuse a whole design or architecture. A domain architecture, sharing a common software architecture across a product line, includes common components shared by all products and optional components exploited by a subset of the products. Variability, one of the key concepts in the development of domain architectures indicates the ability to derive various products from the product line. Clearly, we need to support variability during domain architecture development. In this paper, we suggest a metamodeling concept that enables a common under-standing of architecture variability. The domain architecture metamodel reflects the Object Management Group’s (OMGTM) Reusable Asset Specification (RAS) which addresses the engineering elements of reuse. We describe a domain architecture in which commonality and variability are explicitly considered.
This research was supported by the MIC(Ministry of Information and Communication), Korea, under the ITRC(Information Technology Research Center) support program supervised by the IITA(Institute of Information Technology Assessment).
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Muthig, D., Atkinson, C.: Model-Driven Product Line Architecture. In: Proc. Second Software Product Line Conference (August 2002)
The Object Management Group (OMG), Reusable Asset Specification (RAS) Version 2.2 (November 2005), http://www.omg.org/technology/documents/formal/ras.htm
The Object Management Group (OMG), Meta-Object Facility (MOF) Version 1.4 (2003), http://www.omg.org/docs/formal/02-04-03.pdf
Duffy, D.J.: Domain Architectures: Models and Architectures for UML Applications. Wiley, Chichester (2004)
Moon, M., Yeom, K., Chae, H.S.: An Approach to Developing Domain Requirements as a Core Asset Based on Commonality and Variability in a Product Line. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 31(7), 551–569 (2005)
Kang, K.C., Kim, S., Lee, J., Kim, K.: FORM: A Feature-Oriented Reuse Method with Domain Specific Reference Architectures. Annals of Software Engineering 5, 143–168 (1998)
Kang, K., Cohen, S., Hess, J., Novak, W., Peterson, S.: Feature-Oriented Domain Analysis (FODA) Feasibility Study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-90-TR-21, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University (November 1990)
Keepence, B., Mannion, M.: Using patterns to model variability in product families. IEEE Software 16(4), 102–108 (1999)
Gomma, H.: Designing Software Product Lines with UML, From Use Cases to Pattern-Based Software Architectures. Addison-Wesley, Reading (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Moon, M., Chae, H.S., Yeom, K. (2006). A Metamodel Approach to Architecture Variability in a Product Line. In: Morisio, M. (eds) Reuse of Off-the-Shelf Components. ICSR 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4039. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11763864_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11763864_9
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34606-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34607-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)