Skip to main content

Discrimination-Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Classifiers

  • Conference paper
Flexible Query Answering Systems (FQAS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4027))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 512 Accesses

Abstract

Evaluating the performance of classifiers is a difficult task in machine learning. Many criteria have been proposed and used in such a process. Each criterion measures some facets of classifiers. However, none is good enough for all cases. In this communication, we justify the use of discrimination measures for evaluating classifiers. The justification is mainly based on a hierarchical model for discrimination measures, which was introduced and used in the induction of decision trees.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alvarez, I.: Explaining the result of a decision tree to the end-user. In: Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence, ECAI 2004, pp. 411–415 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bradley, A.P.: The use of the area under the roc curve in the evaluation of machine learning algorithms. Pattern Recognition 30(7), 1145–1159 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Caruana, R., Joachims, T., Backstrom, L.: KDD-Cup 2004: Results and analysis. SIGKDD Explorations 6(2), 95–108 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dang, T.H.: Entropies et leurs applications en apprentissage inductif (rapport de pré-soutenance). Technical report, Université Paris 6, France (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dang, T.H., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Marsala, C.: Measures of information for inductive learning. In: Proc. of Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knownledge-Based Systems, IPMU 2004, Perugia - Italy, July 2004, pp. 1495–1502 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fawcett, T.: Roc graphs: Notes and practical considerations for researchers. Machine Learning (1-2) (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kononenko, I., Bratko, I.: Information-based evaluation criterion for classifier’s performance. Machine Learning 6, 67–80 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Korb, K.B., Hope, L.R., Hughes, M.J.: The evaluation of predictive learners: Some theoretical and empirical results. In: EMCL 2001: Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Machine Learning, London, UK, pp. 276–287. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Marsala, C.: Apprentissage inductif en présence de données imprécises: construction et utilisation d’arbres de décision flous. Ph.D thesis, Université Paris 6, France (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Marsala, C., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Ramer, A.: Hierarchical model for discrimination measures. In: Proc. of the eight IFSA 1999 World Congres, Taipei - Taiwan, August 1999, pp. 339–343 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Provost, F.J., Fawcett, T.: Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: Comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions. In: Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 43–48 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Provost, F.J., Fawcett, T., Kohavi, R.: The case against accuracy estimation for comparing induction algorithms. In: ICML 1998: Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 445–453. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc., San Francisco (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Quinlan, J.: Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning 1(1), 81–106 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ramer, A., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Marsala, C.: An alytical structure of hierarchical discrimination. In: Proc. of the IEEE Int. Conf. on Fuzzy Systems, FUZZ-IEEE, Seoul - Korea, August 1999, pp. 1050–1053 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Hettich, C.B.S., Merz, C.: UCI repository of machine learning databases (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 27, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Stermann, F., Longuet, N.: Document technique de DTGen, rapport de stage de fin d’étude, DESS IA. Technical report, Laboratoire d’Informatique de Paris 6, Avril (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Dang, T.H., Marsala, C., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Boucher, A. (2006). Discrimination-Based Criteria for the Evaluation of Classifiers. In: Larsen, H.L., Pasi, G., Ortiz-Arroyo, D., Andreasen, T., Christiansen, H. (eds) Flexible Query Answering Systems. FQAS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4027. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11766254_47

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11766254_47

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34638-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34639-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics