Abstract
The field of formal methods provides all kinds of powerful techniques for the specification, design, verification, validation, and ramp-up of systems. Petri nets, in different versions and “levels”, are among those techniques that have successfully been used in various fields of application and for different engineering tasks.
During the full development process of a system, different engineers have different tasks. Each engineering task has its specific purpose and, therefore, some version of Petri net or some formal method is better suited for this task than others. In order to take full advantage of formal methods, engineers need to switch between different techniques.
Unfortunately, different techniques have different underlying forma- lisms and notations, they use different concepts and methods, and they are supported by different and, in many cases, incompatible tools. Therefore, most applications of formal methods are restricted to one technique, formalism, and tool – though using several techniques in combination would have many benefits.
The Component Tools project aims at easing the application and the integration of several formal methods with different underlying formalisms, notations, and tools for all kinds of application areas. To this end, Component Tools supports the definition of components with different underlying formal models in different notations and on different levels of abstraction for different purposes. Moreover, Component Tools supports the definition of transformations to different tools. This way, an engineer can use these components for designing, verifying, and validating a system with support from formal methods and their tools under a uniform graphical user interface – without even knowing the details of the underlying techniques and formalisms.
Initially, Component Tools was inspired by the use of different versions of Petri nets during the development process. But, it turned out that the concepts of Component Tools are much more general and can be used for integrating other formal methods. In this paper, we outline the basic idea, the concepts, and the main ingredients of Component Tools by using a simplified example from the area of flexible manufacturing systems, where the models are Petri nets on different levels of abstraction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Agrawal, A., Karsai, G., Kalmar, Z., Neema, S., Shi, F., Vizhanyo, A.: The design of a simple language for graph transformations. Journal in Software and System Modeling (2005) (in review)
Brooks Automation Corporate: AutoMod Suite, http://www.automod.com/products/products.asp
Czarnecki, K., Helsen, S.: Classification of model transformation approaches. In: OOPSLA 2003 Workshop on Generative Techniques in the Context of Model-Driven Architecture (2003)
Dangelmaier, W., Mueck, B., Laroque, C., Mahajan, K.R.: d3fact insight: A simulation-tool for multiresolution material flow models. In: Lipovszki, I., György, M. (eds.) Simulation in Industry - 16th European Simulation Symposium (ESS 2004) SCS, Europe, pp. 17–22 (2004)
FASTEC GmbH, Lontrol, http://www.fastec.de/
Gepting, A., Greenyer, J., Kindler, E., Maas, A., Munkelt, S., Pales, C., Pivl, T., Rohe, O., Rubin, V., Sanders, M., Scholand, A., Wagner, C., Wagner, R.: Component tools: A vision of a tool. In: Proc. of the 11th Workshop on Algorithms and Tools for Petri Nets (AWPN), ser. Tech. Rep. tr-ri-04-251, Paderborn, Germany, September 2004, pp. 37–42 (2004)
Giese, H., Kindler, E., Klein, F., Wagner, R.: Reconciling scenario-centered controller design with state-based system models. In: 4th International Workshop on Scenarios and State Machines: Models, Algorithms and Tools (SCESM 2005), Satellite event of ICSE 2005 (May 2005)
Greenyer, J.: Maintaining and using component libraries for the design of material flow systems: Concept and prototypical implementation. Bachelor thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (October 2003)
Greenyer, J.: A study of technologies for model transformation: Reconciling TGGs with QVT. Master thesis, Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (July 2006) (in preparation)
Harel, D., Marelly, R.: Come let’s play: Scenario-based programming using LSCs and the Play-engine. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Kindler, E., Nillies, F.: Petri nets and the real world. In: Schmidt, K., Stahl, C. (eds.) AWPN workshop 2005, proceedings, Berlin, Germany, September 2005, pp. 19–24 (2005)
Kindler, E., Páles, C.: 3D-visualization of Petri net models: Concept and realization. In: Cortadella, J., Reisig, W. (eds.) ICATPN 2004. LNCS, vol. 3099, pp. 464–473. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Kindler, E., Rubin, V., Wagner, R.: An adaptable TGG interpreter for in-memory model transformation. In: Proc. of the Fujaba Days 2004, Darmstadt, Germany, September 2004, pp. 35–38 (2004)
OMG, Model Driven Architecture, http://www.omg.org/mda/
Rust, C., Stroop, J., Tacken, J.: The Design of Embedded Real-Time Systems using the SEA Environment. In: Proc. of the 5th Annual Australasian Conference on Parallel And Real-Time Systems (PART 1998), Adelaide, Australia (September 1998)
Schmelter, D.: Play-In und Play-Out von Szenarien von Component-Tools. Bachelor thesis (in German), Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (November 2005)
Scholand, A.: Steuerungssynthese für komponentenbasierte Systeme unter partieller Sichtbarkeit. Master thesis (in German), Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (April 2006) (in preparation)
Schürr, A.: Specification of graph translators with triple graph grammars. In: Mayr, E.W., Schmidt, G., Tinhofer, G. (eds.) WG 1994. LNCS, vol. 903, pp. 151–163. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)
Tecnomatix Technologies Ltd., eMPower Solutions, http://www.tecnomatix.com/
Varró, D., Varró, G., Pataricza, A.: Designing the automatic transformation of visual languages. Science of Computer Programming 44(2), 205–227 (2002)
Weber, M., Kindler, E.: The Petri Net Kernel. In: Ehrig, H., Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G., Weber, H. (eds.) Petri Net Technology for Communication-Based Systems. LNCS, vol. 2472, pp. 109–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)
Willink, E.D.: UMLX: A graphical transformation language for MDA. In: MDAFA 2003, pp. 13–24. University of Twente, Entschede, Netherlands (2003)
W3C, XSL Transformations (XSLT) Version 1.0 (November 1999) [Online] Available: http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt
Zarbock, M.: Ermittlung von Fehlerursachen in Prduktionsanalgen. Master thesis (in German), Department of Computer Science, University of Paderborn (July 2006) (in preparation)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Kindler, E., Rubin, V., Wagner, R. (2006). Component Tools: Integrating Petri Nets with Other Formal Methods. In: Donatelli, S., Thiagarajan, P.S. (eds) Petri Nets and Other Models of Concurrency - ICATPN 2006. ICATPN 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4024. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11767589_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11767589_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-34699-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-34700-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)