Abstract
This paper presents an approach for intelligent tutoring in the field of legal argumentation. In this approach, students study transcripts of US Supreme Court oral argument and create a graphical representation of argument flow as tests offered by attorneys being challenged by hypotheticals posed by Justices. The proposed system, which is based on the collaborative modeling framework Cool Modes, is capable of detecting three types of weaknesses in arguments; when it does, it presents the student with a self explanation prompt. This kind of feedback seems more appropriate than the “strong connective feedback” typically offered by model-tracing or constraint-based tutors. Structural and context weaknesses in arguments are handled by graph grammars, and the critical problem of detecting and dealing with content weaknesses in student contributions is addressed through a collaborative filtering approach, thereby avoiding the critical problem of natural language processing in legal argumentation. An early version of the system was pilot tested with two students.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aleven, V.: Using Background Knowledge in Case-Based Legal Reasoning: A Computational Model and an Intelligent Learning Environment. Artificial Intelligence 150, 183–238 (2003)
Ashley, K.: Modeling Legal Argument: Reasoning with Cases and Hypotheticals. MIT Press/Bradford Books, Cambridge (1990)
Bench-Capon, T., Leng, P., Staniford, G.: A computer supported environment for the teaching of legal argument. J. of Information, Law & Technology 3 (1998)
Carr, C.: Using Computer Supported Argument Visualization to Teach Legal Argumentation. In: Visualizing Argumentation, pp. 75–96. Springer, London (2003)
Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P.: Social Navigation Support Through Annotation-Based Group Modeling. In: Ardissono, L., Brna, P., Mitrović, A. (eds.) UM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3538, pp. 463–472. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
van Gelder, T.: Argument Mapping with Reason!Able. The American Philosophical Association Newsletter on Philosophy and Computers, 85–90 (2002)
Konstan, J., Riedl, J.: Collaborative Filtering: Supporting social navigation in large, crowded infospaces. In: Designing Information Spaces: The Social Navigation Approach, pp. 43–81. Springer, Berlin (2002)
Muntjewerff, J., Breuker, J.: Evaluating PROSA, a system to train solving legal cases. In: Proc. of AIED, pp. 278–285. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)
Paolocci, M., Suthers, D., Weiner, A.: Automated Advice-Giving Strategies for Scientific Inquiry. In: Proc. of ITS, pp. 372–381. Springer, Berlin (1996)
Pinkwart, N.: Collaborative Modeling in Graph Based Environments. dissertation.de Verlag, Berlin (2005)
Reed, C., Rowe, G.: Araucaria: Software for Argument Analysis, Diagramming and Representation. International Journal of AI Tools 14, 961–980 (2004)
Rekers, J., Schürr, A.: Defining and parsing visual languages with layered graph grammars. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing 8, 27–55 (1997)
Rissland, E.: Dimension-Based Analysis of Hypotheticals from Supreme Court Oral Argument. In: Proc. of AI & Law, pp. 111–120. ACM Press, New York (1989)
Schworm, S., Renkl, A.: Learning by solved example problems: Instructional explanations reduce selfexplanation activity. In: Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 816–821. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah (2002)
Suthers, D., Hundhausen, C.: An Experimental Study of the Effects of Representational Guidance on Collaborative Learning Processes. Journal of the Learning Sciences 12, 183–218 (2003)
Toulmin, S.: The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1958)
Verheij, B.: Artificial argument assistants for defeasible argumentation. Artificial Intelligence 150, 291–324 (2003)
Walton, D.: Legal Argumentation and Evidence. Penn State Press (2002)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pinkwart, N., Aleven, V., Ashley, K., Lynch, C. (2006). Toward Legal Argument Instruction with Graph Grammars and Collaborative Filtering Techniques. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_23
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)