Skip to main content

Semantic Web Technologies Applied to Interoperability on an Educational Portal

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes an approach to promote interoperability among heterogeneous agents that are part of an Educational Portal (PortEdu). We focus on a specific agent, the social agent, adding all the necessary functionality for him to interact with agents that aren’t fully aware of its context. The social agent belongs to a Multi-agent Learning Environment designed to support training of diagnostic reasoning and modeling of domains with complex and uncertain knowledge, AMPLIA. The knowledge of the social agent is implemented with Bayesian networks, which allows the agent to represent its probabilistic knowledge and make its decisions. However, to communicate with agents outside AMPLIA, it is necessary to express such probabilistic knowledge in a way that all agents may process. Such requirement is addressed using OWL, an ontology language developed by W3C to be used on the Semantic Web.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pan, R., Ding, Z., Yu, Y., Peng, Y.: A bayesian network approach to ontology mapping. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 563–577. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Carroll, J.J., et al.: Jena: Implementing the Semantic Web Recommendations. In: Proceedings of the 13th International World Wide Web Conference, pp. 74–83. ACM Press, New York (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fikes, R., Hayes, P., Horrocks, I.: OWL-QL - A Language for Deductive Query Answering on the Semantic Web. Journal of Web Semantics. Science Direct 2(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Working with Multiple Ontologies on the Semantic Web. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 620–634. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Bellifemine, F., Poggi, A., Rimassa, G.: Developing multiagent systems with a FIPA-compliant agent framework. In: Software - Practice & Experience, vol. 31, pp. 103–128. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Harmelen, P.F.: From SHIQ and RDF to OWL: The making of a web ontology language. Journal of Web Semantics 1, 7–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Berners Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The Semantic Web. Scientific American 284(5), 35–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ding, L., Kolari, P., Ding, Z., Avancha, S.: Using Ontologies in the Semantic Web: A Survey. In: Ontologies in the Context of Information Systems. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dean, M., Schreiber, G. (eds.): OWL Web Ontology Language Reference, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl-ref/

  10. Nakayama, L., Viccari, R.M., Coelho, H.: An Information Retrieving Service for Distance Learning. Transactions On Internet Research 1, 49–56 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Costa, P., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J.: PR-OWL: A Bayesian Ontology Language for the Semantic Web. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web, International Semantic Web Conference (to appear, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  12. FIPA. FIPA ACL Message Structure Specification SC00061, http://www.fipa.org/specs/fipa00061/

  13. FIPA-OS Agent Toolkit, http://fipa-os.sourceforge.net/index.htm

  14. Miller, L., Seaborne, A., Reggiori, A.: Three Implementations of SquishQL, a Simple RDF Query Language. In: Horrocks, I., Hendler, J. (eds.) ISWC 2002. LNCS, vol. 2342, p. 423. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Vicari, R.M., Flores, C.D., Seixas, L., Silvestre, A., Ladeira, M., Coelho, H.: A Multi-Agent Intelligent Environment for Medical Knowledge. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 27, 335–366 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Maturana, H., Varela, F.: Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding. Shambhala Publications, Boston (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Aronson, E., Wilson, T.D., Akert, R.M.: Social Psychology, 5th edn. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Vassileva, J.: Multi-agent architectures for distributed learning environments. In: AIED Proceedings, vol. 12, pp. 1060–1069 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Castelfranchi, C., e Falcone, R.: Principles of Trust for MAS: Cognitive Anatomy, Social Importance and Qualification. In: ICMAS 1998 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moreno, J.L.: Who Shall Survive? Foundations of Sociometry, Group Psychotherapy and Psychodrama. Beacon House, Beacon (1953)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Conati, C.: Probabilistic assessment of user’s emotions in educational games. Journal of Applied Artificial Intelligence 16(7-8), 555–575 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jaques, P.A., Viccari, R.M.: A BDI Approach to Infer Student’s Emotions. In: Lemaître, C., Reyes, C.A., González, J.A. (eds.) IBERAMIA 2004. LNCS, vol. 3315, pp. 901–911. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Zou, Y., Finin, T., Li, D., Chen, H., Rong, P.: Using Semantic Web Technology in Multi-Agent Systems: A Case Study in the TAGA Trading Agent Environment. In: Proceeding of the 5th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, ICEC 2003, pp. 95–101. ACM Press, New York (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiesman, F., Roos, N.: Domain Independent Learning of Ontology Mappings. In: Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 346–853. IEEE, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  25. The Protegé Ontology Editor and Knowledge Acquisition System, Available at: http://protege.stanford.edu

  26. Madsen, A.L., Jensen, F., Kjærulff, U.B., Lang, M.: HUGIN - The Tool for Bayesian Networks and Influence Diagrams. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Tools 14(3), 507–543 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Prud’hommeaux, E., Seaborne, A.: SPARQL Query Language for RDF(2006), Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-sparql-query/

  28. Laskey, K.B.: Costa, Paulo Of Klingons and Starships: Bayesian Logic for the 23rd Century. In: Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence: Proceedings of the Twenty-first Conference. AUAI Press, Edinburgh (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Santos, E.R., Boff, E., Vicari, R.M. (2006). Semantic Web Technologies Applied to Interoperability on an Educational Portal. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics