Skip to main content

Supporting Tutorial Feedback to Student Help Requests and Errors in Symbolic Differentiation

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3690 Accesses

Abstract

The provision of intelligent, user-adaptive, and effective feedback requires human tutors to exploit their expert knowledge about the domain of instruction, and to diagnose students’ actions through a potentially huge space of possible solutions and misconceptions. Designers and developers of intelligent tutoring systems strive to simulate good human tutors, and to replicate their reasoning and diagnosis capabilities as well as their pedagogical expertise. This is a huge undertaking because it requires an adequate acquisition, formalisation, and operationalisation of material that supports reasoning, diagnosis, and natural interaction with the learner. In this paper, we describe SLOPERT, a glass-box reasoner and diagnoser for symbolic differentiation. Its expert task model, which is enriched with buggy rules, has been informed by an analysis of human-human tutorial dialogues. SLOPERT can provide natural step-by-step solutions for any given problem as well as diagnosis support for typical student errors. SLOPERT’s capabilities thus support the generation of natural problem-solving hints and scaffolding help.

Funded by the European Commission’s 6th Framework Programme: IST-507826.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Anderson, J.R., Boyle, C.F., Corbett, A.T., Lewis, M.W.: Cognitive modeling and intelligent tutoring. Artificial Intelligence 42, 7–49 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Brown, J.S., Burton, R.R.: Diagnostic models for procedural bugs in basic mathematical skills. Cognitive Science 2, 155–192 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bundy, A., Welham, B.: Using meta-level inference for selective application of multiple rewrite rule sets in algebraic manipulation. Artificial Intelligence 16(2), 189–212 (1981)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Graesser, A.C., Person, N.K., Magliano, J.P.: Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one-to-one tutoring. Applied Cognitive Psychology 9, 495–522 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henneke, M.: Online Diagnose in intelligenten mathematischen Lehr-Lern-Systemen. PhD thesis, Universität Hildesheim (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hume, G., Michael, J., Rovick, A., Evens, M.: The use of hints as a tutorial tactic. In: 15th Cognitive Science Conf., pp. 563–568. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Merrill, D.C., Reiser, B.J., Ranney, M., Trafton, J.G.: Effective tutoring techniques: Comparison of human tutors and intelligent tutoring systems. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3), 277–305 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zinn, C. (2006). Supporting Tutorial Feedback to Student Help Requests and Errors in Symbolic Differentiation. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics