Abstract
This paper describes a study where students were able to view an open learner model in seven formats. They were provided with tools to edit this model directly, to attempt to persuade the system to change it, or to enter into a negotiation about the model contents. Results indicate that many students are less comfortable having direct control over the content of their learner model than in situations where the system has the final say over proposed changes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Mabbott, A., Bull, S.: Alternative Views on Knowledge: Presentation of Open Learner Models. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 689–698. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Papanikolaou, K.A., Mabbott, A., Bull, S., Grigoriadou, M.: Designing Learner-Controlled Educational Interactions Based on Learning/Cognitive Style and Learner Behaviour, Interacting with Computers. Interdisciplinary Journal of Human-Computer Interaction (in press)
Self, J.A.: Bypassing the Intractable Problem of Student Modelling. In: Frasson, C., Gauthier, G. (eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: at the Crossroads of Artificial Intelligence and Education, Norwood, NJ, pp. 107–123 (1990)
Kay, J.: Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. In: International Conference on Computers in Education, AACE, pp. 17–24 (1997)
Morales, R., Pain, H., Conlon, T.: From behaviour to understandable presentation of learner models: a case study. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Open, Interactive, and other Overt Approaches to Learner Modelling, 9th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Le Mans, France (1999)
Bull, S., Pain, H.: Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me? Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model. In: Greer, J. (ed.) Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, pp. 501–508 (1995)
Dimitrova, V.: StyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13, 35–78 (2003)
Kerly, A., Bull, S.: The potential for chatbots in negotiated learner modelling: A wizard-of-oz study. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, T.-W. (eds.) ITS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4053, pp. 443–452. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Baker, M.J.: Negotiated Tutoring. An Approach to Interaction in Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Unpublished PhD thesis. Open University, Milton Keynes, UK (1990)
Kelley, J.F.: An iterative design methodology for user-friendly natural language office information applications. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) 2(1), 26–41 (1984)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Mabbott, A., Bull, S. (2006). Student Preferences for Editing, Persuading, and Negotiating the Open Learner Model. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_48
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_48
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)