Skip to main content

Scaffolding Problem Solving with Annotated, Worked-Out Examples to Promote Deep Learning

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3777 Accesses

Abstract

This study compares the relative utility of an intelligent tutoring system that uses procedure-based hints to a version that uses worked-out examples for learning college level physics. In order to test which strategy produced better gains in competence, two versions of Andes were used: one offered participants graded hints and the other offered annotated, worked-out examples in response to their help requests. We found that providing examples was at least as effective as the hint sequences and was more efficient in terms of the number of problems it took to obtain the same level of mastery.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bloom, B.S.: The 2 sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–16 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sweller, J., Cooper, G.A.: The use of worked examples as a substitute for problem solving in learning algebra. Cognition and Instruction 2(1), 59–89 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, G., Sweller, J.: Effects of schema acquisition and rule automation on mathematical problem-solving transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 79(4), 347–362 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, D.E.: Using examples and analogies to remediate misconceptions in physics: Factors influencing conceptual change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 29(1), 17–34 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Catrambone, R.: Aiding subgoal learning - effects on transfer. Journal of Educational Psychology 87(1), 5–17 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Koehler, M.J.: Designing case-based hypermedia for developing understanding children’s mathematical reasoning. Cognition and Instruction 20(2), 151–195 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. VanLehn, K., Lynch, C., Schulze, K., Shapiro, J.A., Shelby, R., Taylor, L., Treacy, D., Weinstein, A., Wintersgill, M.: Andes physics tutoring system: Five years of evaluations. In: Looi, G.M.C.K. (ed.) Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K.R.: Investigations into help seeking and learning with a cognitive tutor. In: Papers of the AIED 2001 Workshop on Help Provision and Help Seeking in Interactive Learning Environments, pp. 47–58 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. LeFevre, J.A., Dixon, P.: Do written instructions need examples? Cognition and Instruction 3(1), 1–30 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Trafton, J.G., Reiser, B.J.: The contribution of studying examples and solving problems to skill acquisition. In: Proceedings of the 15th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1017–1022. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Hillsdale (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Chi, M.T.H., Bassok, M., Lewis, M.W., Reimann, P., Glaser, R.: Self-explanations: How students study and use examples in learning to solve problems. Cognitive Science 13(2), 145–182 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chi, M.T.H., VanLehn, K.A.: The content of physics self-explanations. Journal of the Learning Sciences 1(1), 69–105 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. VanLehn, K., Johns, R.M.: Better learners use analogical problem solving sparingly. In: Utgoff, P.E. (ed.) Machine Learning: Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference, pp. 338–345. Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Dufresne, R.J., Gerace, W.J., Hardiman, P.T., Mestre, J.P.: Constraining novices to perform expertlike problem analyses: Effects on schema acquisition. Journal of the Learning Sciences 2(3), 307–331 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kalyuga, S., Ayres, P., Chandler, P., Sweller, J.: The expertise reversal effect. Educational Psychologist 38(1), 23–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Murray, R.C., VanLehn, K.: DT Tutor: A Decision-Theoretic, Dynamic Approach for Optimal Selection of Tutorial Actions. In: Gauthier, G., VanLehn, K., Frasson, C. (eds.) ITS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1839, pp. 153–162. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ringenberg, M.A., VanLehn, K. (2006). Scaffolding Problem Solving with Annotated, Worked-Out Examples to Promote Deep Learning. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_62

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_62

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics