Skip to main content

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tutorial Dialogue Instruction in an Exploratory Learning Context

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3688 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper we evaluate the instructional effectiveness of tutorial dialogue agents in an exploratory learning setting. We hypothesize that the creative nature of an exploratory learning environment creates an opportunity for the benefits of tutorial dialogue to be more clearly evidenced than in previously published studies. In a previous study we showed an advantage for tutorial dialogue support in an exploratory learning environment where that support was administered by human tutors [9]. Here, using a similar experimental setup and materials, we evaluate the effectiveness of tutorial dialogue agents modeled after the human tutors from that study. The results from this study provide evidence of a significant learning benefit of the dialogue agents.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleven, V., Rosé, C.P.: Authoring plug-in tutor agents by demonstration: Rapid rapid tutor development. In: Proceedings of AI in Education (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bloom, B.S.: The 2 Sigma problem: The search for methods of group instruction as effective as one-to-one tutoring. Educational Researcher 13, 4–16 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cohen, P.A., Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C.: Educational outcomes of tutoring: A meta-analysis of findings. American Educational Research Journal 19, 237–248 (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Forbus, K.D., Whalley, P.B., Evrett, J.O., Ureel, L., Brokowski, M., Baher, J., Kuehne, S.E.: CyclePad: An Articulate Virtual Laboratory for Engineering Thermodynamics. Artificial Intelligence 114(1-2), 297–347 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Graesser, A., VanLehn, K.: the TRG, & the NLT, Why2 Report: Evaluation of Why/Atlas, Why/AutoTutor, and Accomplished Human Tutors on Learning Gains for Qualitative Physics Problems and Explanations, LRDC Tech. Report, University of Pittsburgh (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graesser, A.C., Jackson, G.T., Mathews, E.C., Mitchell, H.H., Olney, A., Ventura, M., Chipman, P., Franceschetti, D., Hu, X., Louwerse, M.M., Person, N.K.: The Tutoring ResearchGroup: Why/AutoTutor: A Test of Learning Gains from a Physics Tutor with Natural Language Dialog. In: Proceedings of the Cognitive Science Society (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Koedinger, K.R., Aleven, V., Heffernan, N.T., McLaren, B.M., Hockenberry, M.: Opening the Door to Non-programmers: Authoring Intelligent Tutor Behavior by Demonstration. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 162–174. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Person, N., Bautista, L., Graesser, A., Mathews, E.: The Tutoring Research Group. In: Moore, J.D., Redfield, C.L., Johnson, W.L. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless Future, Proceedings of AI-ED 2001, pp. 286–293. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rosé, C.P., Aleven, V., Carey, R., Robinson, A., Wu, C.: A First Evaluation of the Instructional Value of Negotiatble Problem Solving Goals on the Exploratory Learning Continuum. In: Proceedings of AI in Education (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Penstein Rosé, C., Torrey, C., Aleven, V., Wu, A.R.C., Forbus, K.D.: CycleTalk: Toward a dialogue agent that guides design with an articulate simulator. In: Lester, J.C., Vicari, R.M., Paraguaçu, F. (eds.) ITS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3220, pp. 401–411. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Rosé, C.P., Jordan, P., Ringenberg, M., Siler, S., VanLehn, K., Weinstein, A.: Interactive Conceptual Tutoring in Atlas-Andes. In: Proceedings of AI in Education (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. VanLehn, K., Graesser, A., Tanner, J., Jordan, P., Olney, A., Rosé, C.P.: When is reading just as effective as one-on-one interactive tutoring? In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kumar, R., Rosé, C., Aleven, V., Iglesias, A., Robinson, A. (2006). Evaluating the Effectiveness of Tutorial Dialogue Instruction in an Exploratory Learning Context. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics