Skip to main content

Reflective Tutoring for Immersive Simulation

  • Conference paper
Intelligent Tutoring Systems (ITS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 4053))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3233 Accesses

Abstract

Reflection is critically important for time-constrained training simulations that do not permit extensive tutor-student interactions during an exercise. Here, we describe a reflective tutoring system for a virtual human simulation of negotiation. The tutor helps students review their exercise, elicits where and how they could have done better, and uses explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to allow students the chance to ask questions about the virtual human’s behavior.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Katz, S., Allbritton, D., Connelly, J.: Going beyond the problem given: How human tutors use post-solution discussions to support transfer. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 13, 79–116 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Morrison, J.E., Meliza, L.L.: Foundations of the after action review process. Technical Report 42, U.S. Army Research Institute (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Core, M.G., Lane, H.C., van Lent, M., Gomboc, D., Solomon, S., Rosenberg, M.: Building explainable artificial intelligence systems. In: Proc. of the 18th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (IAAI 2006), Boston, MA (2006) (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Johnson, W.L.: Agents that learn to explain themselves. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 1257–1263 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mayer, R.: Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? the case for guided methods of instruction. American Psychologist 59(1), 14–19 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Peters, S., Bratt, E.O., Clark, B., Bon-Parry, H., Schultz, K.: Intelligent systems for training damage control assistants. In: Proc. of Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC 2004), Orlando, FL (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Traum, D.R., Swartout, W.R., Marsella, S.C., Gratch, J.: Fight, flight, or negotiate: Believable strategies for conversing under crisis. In: Panayiotopoulos, T., Gratch, J., Aylett, R.S., Ballin, D., Olivier, P., Rist, T. (eds.) IVA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3661, pp. 52–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lane, H.C., Core, M., Gomboc, D., Solomon, S., van Lent, M., Rosenberg, M. (2006). Reflective Tutoring for Immersive Simulation. In: Ikeda, M., Ashley, K.D., Chan, TW. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4053. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_83

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11774303_83

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35159-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35160-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics