Skip to main content

An Approach to Detecting Shill-Biddable Allocations in Combinatorial Auctions

  • Conference paper
Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce and Services (DEECS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 4055))

  • 463 Accesses

Abstract

This paper presents a method for discovering and detecting shill bids in combinatorial auctions. Combinatorial auctions have been studied very widely. The Generalized Vickrey Auction (GVA) is one of the most important combinatorial auctions because it can satisfy the strategy-proof property and Pareto efficiency. As Yokoo et al. pointed out, false-name bids and shill bids pose an emerging problem for auctions, since on the Internet it is easy to establish different e-mail addresses and accounts for auction sites. Yokoo et al. proved that GVA cannot satisfy the false-name-proof property. Moreover, they proved that there is no auction protocol that can satisfy all three of the above major properties. Their approach concentrates on designing new mechanisms. As a new approach against shill-bids, in this paper, we propose a method for finding shill bids with the GVA in order to avoid them. Our algorithm can judge whether there might be a shill bid from the results of the GVA’s procedure. However, a straightforward way to detect shill bids requires an exponential amount of computing power because we need to check all possible combinations of bidders. Therefore, in this paper we propose an improved method for finding a shill bidder. The method is based on winning bidders, which can dramatically reduce the computational cost. The results demonstrate that the proposed method successfully reduces the computational cost needed to find shill bids. The contribution of our work is in the integration of the theory and detecting fraud in combinatorial auctions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Clarke, E.H.: Multipart pricing of public goods. Public Choice 11, 17–33 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Fujishima, Y., Leyton-Brown, K., Shoham, Y.: Taming the computational complexity of combinatorial auctions: Optimal and approximate approaches. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 548–553 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Groves, T.: Incentives in teams. Econometrica 41, 617–631 (1973)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Lehmann, D., O’Callaghan, L.I., Shoham, Y.: Truth revelation in approximately efficient combinatorial auctions. Journal of the ACM 49(5), 577–602 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Leyton-Brown, K., Tennenholtz, M., Shoham, Y.: An algorithm for multi-unit combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2000) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Milgrom, P.: Putting Auction Theory to Work. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Sandholm, T.: An algorithm for optimal winnr determination in combinatorial auctions. In: Proc. of the 16th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1999), pp. 542–547 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sandholm, T.: Issues in computational vickrey auctions. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 4(3), 107–129 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sandholm, T., Suri, S., Gilpin, A., Levine, D.: Winner determination in combinatorial auction generalizations. In: Proc. of the 1st International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS 2002), pp. 69–76 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vickrey, W.: Counterspeculation, auctions, and competitive sealed tenders. Journal of Finance XVI, 8–37 (1961)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Matsubara, S.: Bundle design in robust combinatorial auction protocol against false-name bids. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 1095–1101 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Matsubara, S.: Robust multi-unit auction protocol against false-name bids. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 2001), pp. 1089–1094 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yokoo, M., Sakurai, Y., Matsubara, S.: The effect of false-name bids in combinatorial auctions: New fraud in Internet auctions. Games and Economic Behavior 46(1), 174–188 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Matsuo, T., Ito, T., Shintani, T. (2006). An Approach to Detecting Shill-Biddable Allocations in Combinatorial Auctions. In: Lee, J., Shim, J., Lee, Sg., Bussler, C., Shim, S. (eds) Data Engineering Issues in E-Commerce and Services. DEECS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4055. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11780397_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11780397_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35440-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35441-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics