Skip to main content

Don’t Ever Do That! Long-Term Duties in PD e L

  • Conference paper
Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems (DEON 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4048))

Abstract

This paper studies long-term norms concerning actions. In Meyer’s Propositional Deontic Logic (PD e L), only immediate duties can be expressed, however, often one has duties of longer durations such as: “Never do that”, or “Do this someday”. In this paper, we will investigate how to amend PD e L so that such long-term duties can be expressed. This leads to the interesting and suprising consequence that the long-term prohibition and obligation are not interdefinable in our semantics, while there is a duality between these two notions. As a consequence, we have provided a new analysis of the long-term obligation by introducing a new atomic proposition I (indebtedness) to represent the condition that an agent has some unfulfilled obligation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Anderson, A.R.: Some nasty problems in the formalization of ethics. Noûs 1, 345–360 (1967)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castañeda, H.-N.: The paradoxes of deontic logic. In: Hilpinen, R. (ed.) New studies in deontic logic, pp. 37–85. Reidel, Dordrecht (1981)

    Google Scholar 

  • Harel, D.: Dynamic logic. In: Gabbay, D., Guenthner, F. (eds.) Handbook of philosophical logic, vol. II, pp. 497–604. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, K.: The logic of reliable inquiry. Logic and Computation in Philosophy. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.-J.C.: A different approach to deontic logic: Deontic logic viewed as a variant of dynamic logic. Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 29, 106–136 (1988)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.-J.C.: Using programming concepts in deontic reasoning. In: Bartsch, R., van Benthem, J.F.A.K., van Emde Boas, P. (eds.) Semantics and contextual expression, pp. 117–145. FORIS publications, Dordrecht (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J.-J.C.: Dynamic logic for reasoning about actions and agents. In: Logic-based artificial intelligence, pp. 281–311. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • von Wright, G.H.: Deontic logic. Mind 60, 1–15 (1951)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hughes, J., Royakkers, L. (2006). Don’t Ever Do That! Long-Term Duties in PD e L . In: Goble, L., Meyer, JJ.C. (eds) Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems. DEON 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4048. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_12

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35842-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35843-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics