Abstract
The term Electronic Institution seems to be well accepted in the agent community and to a certain extent also in the e-commerce research community. However, a search for a definition of an electronic institution does not yield any results on the Internet. This is different for the term institution. North [9] defines institutions (more or less) to be a set of norms that govern the interactions of a group of people. Examples are family and government. Here we are not so much interested in giving a very precise definition of an institution, but just want to note that the concept refers to a very abstract notion of a set of norms or social structure.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F., Meyer, J.-J.C., Vázquez-Salceda, J.: Proving norm compliance of protocols in electronic institutions. Technical Report UU-CS-2005-010, Institute of Information & Computing Sciences, Universiteit Utrecht, The Netherlands (2005)
Broersen, J., Dignum, F.P.M., Dignum, V., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Designing a deontic logic of deadlines. In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS, vol. 3065, pp. 43–56. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Castelfranchi, C., Dignum, F., Jonker, C., Treur, J.: Deliberate normative agents: Principles and architectures. In: Jennings, N.R. (ed.) ATAL 1999. LNCS, vol. 1757, pp. 364–378. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)
Dignum, F.: Autonomous agents with norms. Artificial Intelligence and law 7, 69–79 (1999)
Esteva, M., RodrÃguez-Aguilar, J.A., Rosell, B., Arcos, J.L.: Ameli: An agent-based middleware for electronic institutions. In: Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-agent Systems, New York, US, pp. 236–243. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2004)
Grossi, D., Dignum, F.P.M., Royakkers, L.M.M., Meyer, J.-J.C.: Collective obligations and agents: Who gets the blame? In: Lomuscio, A., Nute, D. (eds.) DEON 2004. LNCS, vol. 3065, pp. 129–145. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Grossi, D., Meyer, J.-J.C., Dignum, F.P.M.: Counts-as: Classification or constitution? An answer using modal logic. In: Goble, L., Meyer, J.-J.C. (eds.) DEON 2006. LNCS, vol. 4048, pp. 115–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Jones, A.J.I., Sergot, M.: A formal characterization of institutionalised power. Journal of the IGPL 3, 429–445 (1996)
North, D.C.: Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
Royakkers, L., Grossi, D., Dignum, F.: Responsibilities in organizations. In: Lehman, J., Biasiotti, M.A., Francesconi, E., Sagri, M.T. (eds.) LOAIT - Legal Ontologies and Artificial Intelligence Techniques, IAAIL Workshop Series, Bologna, June 2005, vol. 4, pp. 1–11. Wolf Legal Publishers (2005)
Vázquez-Salceda, J., Aldewereld, H., Dignum, F.: Norms in multiagent systems: from theory to practice. International Journal of Computer Systems Science & Engineering 20(4), 95–114 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Dignum, F. (2006). Norms and Electronic Institutions. In: Goble, L., Meyer, JJ.C. (eds) Deontic Logic and Artificial Normative Systems. DEON 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4048. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786849_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35842-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35843-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)