Abstract
We study the load balancing problem in the context of a set of clients each wishing to run a job on a server selected among a subset of permissible servers for the particular client. We consider two different scenarios. In selfish load balancing, each client is selfish in the sense that it selects to run its job to the server among its permissible servers having the smallest latency given the assignments of the jobs of other clients to servers. In online load balancing, clients appear online and, when a client appears, it has to make an irrevocable decision and assign its job to one of its permissible servers. Here, we assume that the clients aim to optimize some global criterion but in an online fashion. A natural local optimization criterion that can be used by each client when making its decision is to assign its job to that server that gives the minimum increase of the global objective. This gives rise to greedy online solutions. The aim of this paper is to determine how much the quality of load balancing is affected by selfishness and greediness.
We characterize almost completely the impact of selfishness and greediness in load balancing by presenting new and improved, tight or almost tight bounds on the price of anarchy and price of stability of selfish load balancing as well as on the competitiveness of the greedy algorithm for online load balancing when the objective is to minimize the total latency of all clients on servers with linear latency functions.
This work was partially supported by the European Union under IST FET Integrated Project 015964 AEOLUS and COST Action 293 GRAAL.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alon, N., Azar, Y., Woeginger, G.J., Yadid, T.: Approximation schemes for scheduling. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 1997), pp. 493–500 (1997)
Avidor, A., Azar, Y., Sgall, J.: Ancient and new algorithms for load balancing in the L p norm. Algorithmica 441, 422–441 (2001)
Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Grove, E.F., Kao, M.-Y., Krishnan, P., Vitter, J.S.: Load balancing in the L p norm. In: Proc. of the 36th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS 1995), pp. 383–391 (1995)
Awerbuch, B., Azar, Y., Epstein, A.: The price of routing unsplittable flow. In: Proc. of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2005), pp. 57–66 (2005)
Azar, Y., Epstein, A.: Convex programming for scheduling unrelated parallel machines. In: Proc. of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2005), pp. 331-337 (2005)
Chandra, A.K., Wong, C.K.: Worst-case analysis of a placement algorithm related to storage allocation. SIAM Journal on Computing 4(3), 249–263 (1975)
Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E.: The price of anarchy of finite congestion games. In: Proc. of the 37th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2005), pp. 67-73 (2005)
Christodoulou, G., Koutsoupias, E.: On the price of anarchy and stability of correlated equilibria of linear congestion games. In: Brodal, G.S., Leonardi, S. (eds.) ESA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3669, pp. 59–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Cody, R.A., Coffman, E.G.: Record allocation for minimizing expected retrieval costs on drum-like storage devices. Journal of the ACM 115, 103–115 (1976)
Czumaj, A., Vöcking, B.: Tight bounds for worst-case equilibria. In: Proc. of the 13th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA 2002), pp. 413–420 (2002)
Fabrikant, A., Papadimitriou, C., Talwar, K.: On the complexity of pure equilibria. In: Proc. of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2004), pp. 604–612 (2004)
Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The structure and complexity of Nash equilibria for a selfish routing game. In: Widmayer, P., Triguero, F., Morales, R., Hennessy, M., Eidenbenz, S., Conejo, R. (eds.) ICALP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2380, pp. 123–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Fotakis, D., Kontogiannis, S., Spirakis, P.: Selfish unsplittable flows. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 593–605. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Gairing, M., Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B.: Computing Nash equilibria for scheduling on restricted parallel links. In: Proc. of the 36th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2004), pp. 613-622 (2004)
Koutsoupias, E., Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: Approximate equilibria and ball fusion. Theory of Computing Systems 36(6), 683–693 (2003)
Koutsoupias, E., Papadimitriou, C.: Worst-case equilibria. In: Meinel, C., Tison, S. (eds.) STACS 1999. LNCS, vol. 1563, pp. 404–413. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)
Lücking, T., Mavronicolas, M., Monien, B., Rode, M.: A new model for selfish routing. In: Diekert, V., Habib, M. (eds.) STACS 2004. LNCS, vol. 2996, pp. 547–558. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Mavronicolas, M., Spirakis, P.: The price of selfish routing. In: Proc. of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2001), pp. 510–519 (2001)
Monderer, D., Shapley, L.S.: Potential games. Games and Economic Behavior 14, 124–143 (1996)
Papadimitriou, C.: Algorithms, games and the internet. In: Proc. of the 33rd Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 2001), pp. 749–753 (2001)
Phillips, S., Westbrook, J.: Online load balancing and network flow. In: Proc. of the 25th Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC 1993), pp. 402–411 (1993)
Rosenthal, R.: A class of games possessing pure-strategy Nash equilibria. International Journal of Game Theory 2, 65–67 (1973)
Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: How bad is selfish routing? Journal of the ACM 49(2), 236–259 (2002)
Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E.: Bounding the inefficiency of equilibria in nonatomic congestion games. Games and Economic Behavior 47(2), 389–403 (2004)
Shmoys, D., Wein, J., Williamson, D.: Scheduling parallel machines on-line. SIAM Journal on Computing 24(6), 1313–1331 (1995)
Suri, S., Tóth, C., Zhou, Y.: Selfish load balancing and atomic congestion games. In: Proc. of the 16th Annual ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures (SPAA 2004), pp. 188–195 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Caragiannis, I., Flammini, M., Kaklamanis, C., Kanellopoulos, P., Moscardelli, L. (2006). Tight Bounds for Selfish and Greedy Load Balancing. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4051. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_28
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_28
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35904-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35905-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)