Skip to main content

Comparing Reductions to NP-Complete Sets

  • Conference paper
Automata, Languages and Programming (ICALP 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 4051))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Under the assumption that NP does not have p-measure 0, we investigate reductions to NP-complete sets and prove the following:

  1. 1

    Adaptive reductions are more powerful than nonadaptive reductions: there is a problem that is Turing-complete for NP but not truth-table-complete.

  2. 2

    Strong nondeterministic reductions are more powerful than deterministic reductions: there is a problem that is SNP-complete for NP but not Turing-complete.

  3. 3

    Every problem that is many-one complete for NP is complete under length-increasing reductions that are computed by polynomial-size circuits.

The first item solves one of Lutz and Mayordomo’s “Twelve Problems in Resource-Bounded Measure” (1999). We also show that every problem that is complete for NE is complete under one-to-one, length-increasing reductions that are computed by polynomial-size circuits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Adleman, L., Manders, K.: Reducibility, randomness, and intractability. In: Proceedings of the 9th ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing, pp. 151–163 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Agrawal, A., Allender, E., Impagliazzo, R., Pitassi, T., Rudich, S.: Reducing the complexity of reductions. Computational Complexity 10, 117–138 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Agrawal, M.: Pseudo-random generators and structure of complete degrees. In: 17th Annual IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 139–145 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Agrawal, M., Allender, E., Rudich, S.: Reductions in circuit complexity: An isomorphism theorem and a gap theorem. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 57(2), 127–143 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Ambos-Spies, K., Bentzien, L.: Separating NP-completeness notions under strong hypotheses. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 61(3), 335–361 (2000)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Ambos-Spies, K., Terwijn, S.A., Zheng, X.: Resource bounded randomness and weakly complete problems. Theoretical Computer Science 172(1–2), 195–207 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Berman, L.: Polynomial Reducibilities and Complete Sets. PhD thesis, Cornell University (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Berman, L., Hartmanis, J.: On isomorphism and density of NP and other complete sets. SIAM Journal on Computing 6(2), 305–322 (1977)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Buhrman, H., Homer, S., Torenvliet, L.: Completeness notions for nondeterministic complexity classes. Mathematical Systems Theory 24, 179–200 (1991)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Buhrman, H., Longpré, L.: Compressibility and resource bounded measure. SIAM Journal on Computing 31(3), 876–886 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: On the structure of complete sets. In: Proceedings of the Ninth Annual Structure in Complexity Theory Conference, pp. 118–133. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Buhrman, H., Torenvliet, L.: Complete sets and structure in subrecursive classes. In: Logic Colloquium 1996. Lecture Notes in Logic, vol. 12, pp. 45–78. Association for Symbolic Logic (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chung, M.J., Ravikumar, B.: Strong nondeterministic Turing reduction—a technique for proving intractability. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 39, 2–20 (1989)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Fenner, S., Fortnow, L., Naik, A., Rogers, J.: Inverting onto functions. Information and Computation 186(1), 90–103 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganesan, K., Homer, S.: Complete problems and srong polynomial reducibilities. SIAM Journal on Computing 21(4) (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hemaspaandra, L., Rothe, J., Wechsung, G.: Easy sets and hard certificate schemes. Acta Informatica 34(11), 859–879 (1997)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Hitchcock, J.M., Pavan, A.: Hardness hypotheses, derandomization, and circuit complexity. In: Proceedings of the 24th Conference on Foundations of Software Technology and Theoretical Computer Science, pp. 336–347. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hitchcock, J.M., Pavan, A., Vinodchandran, N.V.: Partial bi-immunity, scaled dimension, and NP-completeness. In: Theory of Computing Systems (to appear)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Homer, S.: Structural properties of complete sets for exponential time. In: Hemaspaandra, L.A., Selman, A.L. (eds.) Complexity Theory Retrospective II, pp. 135–153. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Long, T.J.: On γ-reducibility versus polynomial time many-one reducibility. Theoretical Computer Science 14, 91–101 (1981)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Lutz, J.H.: Almost everywhere high nonuniform complexity. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 44, 220–258 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Lutz, J.H.: The quantitative structure of exponential time. In: Hemaspaandra, L.A., Selman, A.L. (eds.) Complexity Theory Retrospective II, pp. 225–254. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lutz, J.H., Mayordomo, E.: Cook versus Karp-Levin: Separating completeness notions if NP is not small. Theoretical Computer Science 164, 141–163 (1996)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Lutz, J.H., Mayordomo, E.: Twelve problems in resource-bounded measure. Bulletin of the European Association for Theoretical Computer Science 68, 64–80 (1999): Also in Current Trends in Theoretical Computer Science: Entering the 21st Century, pp. 83–101, World Scientific Publishing (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pavan, A.: Comparison of reductions and completeness notions. SIGACT News 34(2), 27–41 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Pavan, A., Selman, A.: Separation of NP-completeness notions. SIAM Journal on Computing 31(3), 906–918 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Pavan, A., Selman, A.: Bi-immunity separates strong NP-completeness notions. Information and Computation 188, 116–126 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang, Y.: NP-hard sets are superterse unless NP is small. Information Processing Letters 61(1), 1–6 (1997)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Watanabe, O.: A comparison of polynomial time completeness notions. Theoretical Computer Science 54, 249–265 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hitchcock, J.M., Pavan, A. (2006). Comparing Reductions to NP-Complete Sets. In: Bugliesi, M., Preneel, B., Sassone, V., Wegener, I. (eds) Automata, Languages and Programming. ICALP 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4051. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11786986_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35904-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35905-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics