Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Semantology: Basic Methods for Knowledge Representations

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application (ICCS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4068))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we introduce the term “Semantology” for naming the theory of semantic structures and their connections. Semantic structures are fundamental for representing knowledge which we demonstrate by discussing basic methods of knowledge representation. In this context we discuss why, in the field of knowledge representation, the term “Semantology” should be given preference to the term “Ontology” .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abiteboul, S., Hull, R., Vianu, V.: Foundations of databases. Adison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Barwise, J., Seligman, J.: Information flow: the logic of distributed systems. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Becker, P., Correia, J.H.: The ToscanaJ Suite for implementing conceptual information systems. In: [GSW 2005], pp. 324–348.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bielefeld, D.: Ontology. In: The Encyclopedia of Science and Religion vol.2 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Burch, R.W.: A Peircean reduction thesis. Texas Tech University Press, Lubbock (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dembowski, P.: Kombinatorik, Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN 2330 - Begriffe und Benennungen: Allgemeine Grundsätze. Beuth, Berlin-Köln (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Deutsches Institut für Normung: DIN 2331 - Begriffssysteme und ihre Darstellung. Beuth, Berlin-Köln (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Eggebrecht, H.H. (Hrsg.): Handbuch der musikalischen Terminologie. Stuttgart (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Eklund, P.W., Groh, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R.: A contextual-logic extension of TOSCANA. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1867, pp. 453–467. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Eschenfelder, D., Kollewe, W., Skorsky, M., Wille, R.: Ein Erkundungssystem zum Baurecht: Methoden der Entwicklung eines TOSCANA-Systems. In: [SW 2000], pp. 254–272 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Foucault, M.: L’archćologie du savoir. Gallimard, Paris (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ganter, B., Stumme, G., Wille, R. (eds.):Formal Concept Analysis: foundations and applications. State-of-the-Art Survey. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3626. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis: mathematical foundations. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Ganter, B., Wille, R.: Contextual Attribute Logic. In: Tepfenhart, W.M. (ed.) ICCS 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1640, pp. 377–388. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Husserl, E.: Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie (= Husserliana 3). Kluwer, Den Haag (1950)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kant, I.: Logic, Dover, Mineola (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Karl, M.: Eine Logik verteilter Systeme und deren Anwendung auf Schaltnetzwerke. Diplomarbeit. FB Mathematik, TU Darmstadt (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Kollewe, W., Skorsky, M., Vogt, F., Wille, R.: TOSCANA - ein Werkzeug zur begrifflichen Analyse und Erkundung von Daten. In: [WZ 1994], pp. 267–288 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Leibniz, G.W.: Opuscules et fragmentes inédites. In: Coutural, L. (ed.) Paris (1903) (New print 1961)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mineau, G., Stumme, G., Wille, R.: Conceptual structures represented by conceptual Graphs and formal concept analysis. In: Tepfenhart, W.M., Cyre, W. (eds.) ICCS 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1640, pp. 423–441. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Øhrstrøm, P., Andersen, J., Schärfe, H.: What has happened to ontology. In: Dau, F., Mugnier, M.-L., Stumme, G. (eds.) ICCS 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3596, pp. 425–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Peirce, C.S.: Reasoning and the logic of things. In: Ketner, K.L. (ed.) with an introduction by K. L. Ketner and H. Putnam. Havard University Press, Cambridge (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Pöschel, R.: Galois connections for operations and relations. In: Denecke, K., Erné, M., Wismath, S.L. (eds.) Galois connections and applications, pp. 231–258. Kluwer, Dordrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Pöschel, R., Kaluznin, L.A.: Funktionen und Relationenalgebren. VEB Verlag der Wissenschaften, Berlin (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Seiler, T.B., Koböck, B., Niedermeier, B.: Rekonstruktion der Entwicklung des Arbeitsbegriffs mit Mitteln der Formalen Begriffsanalyse. TU Darmstadt (1992) (manuskript)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. Adison-Wesley, Reading (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Sowa, J.F.: Conceptual graph summary. In: Nagle, T.E., Nagle, J.A., Gerholz, L.L., Eklund, P.W. (eds.) Conceptual structures: current research and practice, Ellis Horwood, pp. 3–51 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Staab, S., Studer, R. (eds.): Handbook on Ontologies. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stumme, G., Wille, R. (Hrsg.): Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung: Methoden und Anwendungen. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Thom, R.: ‘Modern’ mathematics: an educational and philosophical error? American Scientist 59, 695–699 (1971)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Vogt, F., Wille, R.: TOSCANA – A graphical tool for analyzing and exploring data. In: Tamassia, R., Tollis, I(Y.) G. (eds.) GD 1994. LNCS, vol. 894, pp. 226–233. Springer, Heidelberg (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  34. von Wächter, D.: Ontologie und Semantologie. In: M. Siebel, M. Textor (eds.): Semantik und Ontologie. Beiträge zur philosophischen Forschung. Ontos, Frankfurt a. M., London (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Wille, R.: Liniendiagramme hierarchischer Begriffssysteme. In: Bock, H.H. (Hrsg.): Anwendungen der Klassifikation: Datenanalyse und numerische Klassifikation. Indeks-Verlag, Frankfurt, pp. 32–51, (1984); English translation: Line diagrams of hierachical concept systems. International Classification 11 , pp. 77–86, (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wille, R.: Complete tolerance relations of concept lattices. In: Eigenthaler, G., Kaiser, H.K., Müller, W.B., Nöbauer, W. (eds.) Contributions to General Algebra, Hölder-Pichler-Temsky, Wien, vol. 3, pp. 397–415 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wille, R.: Conceptual landscapes of knowledge: a pragmatic paradigm for knowledge processing. In: Mineau, G., Fall, A. (eds.): Proceedings of the International Symposium on Knowledge Representation, Use, and Storage Efficiency, pp. 2–13. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver (1997); reprinted In: Gaul, W., Locarek-Junge, H. (eds.): Classification in the Information Age, pp. 344–356. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wille, R.: Boolean Concept Logic. In: Ganter, B., Mineau, G.W. (eds.) ICCS 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1867, pp. 317–331. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Wille, R.: Contextual Logic summary. In: Stumme, G. (ed.) Working with conceptual structures. Contributions to ICCS 2000, pp. 265–276. Shaker-Verlag, Aachen (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Wille, R.: Implicational concept graphs. In: Wolff, K.E., Pfeiffer, H.D., Delugach, H.S. (eds.) ICCS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3127, pp. 52–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. Wille, R.: Allgemeine Wissenschaft und transdisziplinäre Methodologie. Technikfolgenabschätzung - Theorie und Praxis Nr. 2, 14. Jahrgang, Forschungszentrum Karlsruhe, pp. 57–62 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Wille, R.: Formal Concept Analysis as mathematical theory of concepts and concept hierarchies. In: [GSW 2005], pp. 1–33

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wille, R.: Conceptual Knowledge Processing in the field of economics. In: [GSW 2005], pp. 226–249

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wille, R.: Methods of Conceptual Knowledge Processing. In: Missaoui, R., Schmidt, J. (eds.) Formal Concept Analysis. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3874, pp. 1–29. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Wille, R., Wille-Henning, R.: Beurteilung von Musikstücken durch Adjektive: Eine begriffsanalytische Exploration. In: Proost, K., Richter, E., (Hrsg.): Von Intentionalität zur Bedeutung konventionalisierter Zeichen. Festschrift für Gisela Harras zum 65. Geburtstag, Narr, Tübingen, pp. 453–475 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Wille, R., Zickwolff, M. (Hrsg.): Begriffliche Wissensverarbeitung - Grundfragen und Aufgaben. B.I.-Wissenschaftsverlag, Mannheim (1994)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Philosophie und Fachbereich Mathematik, Technische Universität Darmstadt, D–64289, Darmstadt

    Petra Gehring & Rudolf Wille

Authors
  1. Petra Gehring
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rudolf Wille
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Communication and Psychology, Aalborg University,  

    Henrik Schärfe

  2. AIFB Institute, Universität Karlsruhe (TH), D-76128, Karlsruhe, Germany

    Pascal Hitzler

  3. Department of Communication, Aalborg University, Kroghstraede 3, 9220, Aalborg, Denmark

    Peter Øhrstrøm

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gehring, P., Wille, R. (2006). Semantology: Basic Methods for Knowledge Representations. In: Schärfe, H., Hitzler, P., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application. ICCS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11787181_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11787181_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35893-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35902-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation