Skip to main content

Representing Wholes by Structure

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application (ICCS 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4068))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 769 Accesses

Abstract

The influence of Part-Whole relationship (partof) on ontology languages is weak because the special semantics of partof is missed in both representations and interpretations. In this paper, we first exemplify the complexity and limitation of using partof for representing wholes. We then investigate the special semantics of partof by analyzing the properties of parts and wholes. The conclusion is that a part should be regarded as something internal to certain whole and a whole is a structured thing which is comprised of some internal things. The special semantics are achieved by introducing some new constructs which are whole structure, part type, role type, Ontology, defined-in relation and play relation. Because the whole structure possesses inherent modularity and local semantics, the representation is very natural and simple. We show the generality and applicability of the presented approach in terms of the problems pointed out in the paper.

This research is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (60403050) and (90612009), and the National Grand Fundamental Research Program of China under Grant No. 2005CB321802.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Artale, A., Franconi, E., Guarino, N., Pazzi, L.: Part-Whole relations in object-centered systems: an overview. Data and Knowledge Eng. 20(3), 347–383 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P. (eds.): The description logic handbook. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Barbier, F., Henderson-Sellers, B., Le Parc-Lacayrelle, A., Bruel, J.-M.: Formalization of the whole-part relationship in the Unified Modeling Language. IEEE Trans. on Software Engineering 29(5), 459–470 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Varzi, R.C.: Parts and places: the structures of spatial representation. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guarino, N.: Concepts, attributes and arbitrary relations. Data and Knowledge Engineering 8, 249–261 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guarino, N., Giaretta, P.: Ontologies and knowledge bases: towards a terminological clarification. In: Toward Very Large Knowledge Bases: Knowledge Building and Knowledge Sharing. IOS Press, Amsterdam (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson-Sellers, B., Barbier, F.: Black and white diamonds. In: Proc. Second International Conf: Unified Modeling Language (UML 1998), pp. 550–565 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Loebe, F.: An analysis of roles: toward ontology-based modeling. Master’s Thesis, University of Leipzig (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Masolo, C., Vieu, L., Bottazzi, E., Catenacci, C., Ferrario, R., Gangemi, A., Guarino, N.: Social roles and their descriptions. In: Pro. of the Ninth International Conference on the Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning, pp. 267–277 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Motschnig-Pitrik, R., Kaasboll, J.: Part-Whole relationship categories and their application in object-oriented analysis. IEEE Trans. Knowledge and Data Eng. 11(5), 779–797 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. UML 2.0 Superstructure, 3rd Revision, OMG document, Object Management Group (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Simons: Parts-A Study in Ontology. Routledge, London (1987)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Snoeck, M., Dedene, G.: Existence dependency: the key to semantic integrity between structural and behavioural aspects of object types. IEEE Trans. Software Engineering 24(24), 233–251 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sowa, J.: Conceptual structures: information processing in mind and machine. AddisonWesley Publishing Company, New York (1984)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sowa, J.: Knowledge representation: logical, philosophical, and computational foundations. Brooks/Cole Publishing Co, Pacific Grove (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Steimann, F.: On the representation of roles in object-oriented and conceptual modelling. Data and Knowledge Engineering 35(1), 83–106 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Winston, M., Chaffin, R., Herrmann, D.: A taxonomy of part-whole relations. Cognitive Science 11, 417–444 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yu, Y., Wang, J., Wang, T., Chen, H. (2006). Representing Wholes by Structure. In: Schärfe, H., Hitzler, P., Øhrstrøm, P. (eds) Conceptual Structures: Inspiration and Application. ICCS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4068. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11787181_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11787181_32

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-35893-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-35902-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics