Skip to main content

Feature Analysis and Classification of Classical Musical Instruments: An Empirical Study

  • Conference paper
Advances in Data Mining. Applications in Medicine, Web Mining, Marketing, Image and Signal Mining (ICDM 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4065))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We present an empirical study on classical music instrument classification. A methodology with feature extraction and evaluation is proposed and assessed with a number of experiments, whose final stage is to detect instruments in solo passages. In feature selection it is found that similar but different rankings for individual tone classification and solo passage instrument recognition are reported. Based on the feature selection results, excerpts from concerto and sonata files are processed, so as to detect and distinguish four major instruments in solo passages: trumpet, flute, violin, and piano. Nineteen features selected from the Mel-frequency cepstral coefficients (MFCC) and the MPEG-7 audio descriptors achieve a recognition rate of around 94% by the best classifier assessed by cross validation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. ISO/IEC Working Group: MPEG-7 overview (2004) (accessed, February 8, 2006), URL http://www.chiariglione.org/mpeg/standards/mpeg-7/mpeg-7.htm

  2. Tzanetakis, G., Cook, P.: Musical genre classification of audio signals. IEEE Transactions on speech and audio processing 10, 293–302 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Aucouturier, J., Pachet, F.: Scaling up music playlist generation. In: Proc. ICME., vol. 1, pp. 105–108 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Divakaran, A., Regunathan, R., Xiong, Z., Casey, M.: Procedure for audio-assisted browsing of news video using generalized sound recognition. In: Proc. SPIE, vol. 5021, pp. 160–166 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Foote, J.: An overview of audio information retrieval. Multimedia Systems 7, 2–10 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Marques, J., Moreno, P.: A study of musical instrument classification using gaussian mixture models and support vector machines. Technical Report CRL 99/4, Compaq Computer Corporation (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eronen, A.: Comparison of features for music instrument recognition. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Applications of Signal Processing to Audio and Acoustics, pp. 19–22 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Essid, S., Richard, G., David, B.: Efficient musical instrument recognition on solo performance music using basic features. In: Proceedings of the Audio Engineering Society 25th International Conference (2004) (accessed, November 22, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Peeters, G., McAdams, S., Herrera, P.: Instrument sound description in the context of mpeg-7. In: Proc. of Inter. Computer Music Conf., pp. 166–169 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Xiong, Z., Radhakrishnan, R., Divakaran, A., Huang, T.: Comparing MFCC and MPEG-7 audio features for feature extraction, maximum likelihood HMM and entropic prior HMM for sports audio classification. In: Proc. of ICME, vol. 3, pp. 397–400 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, J.C., Houix, O.: Feature dependence in the automatic identification of musical woodwind instruments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109(3), 1064–1072 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Essid, S., Richard, G., David, B.: Musical instrument recognition by pairwise classification strategies. IEEE Trans. on Speech and Audio Processing (accessed, December 2, 2005) (to appear, 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Agostini, G., Longari, M., Poolastri, E.: Musical instrument timbres classification with spectral features. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing (1) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Livshin, A.A., Rodet, X.: Musical instrument identification in continuous recordings. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Digital Audio Effects (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eggink, J., Brown, G.J.: Instrument recognition in accompanied sonatas and concertos. In: Proc. of ICASSP, vol. IV, pp. 217–220 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Yu, L., Liu, H.: Efficient feature selection via analysis of relevance and redundancy. J. Machine Learning Research 5, 1205–1224 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Grimaldi, M., Cunningham, P., Kokaram, A.: An evaluation of alternative feature selection strategies and ensemble techniques of classifying music. In: Mladenic, D., Paa, G. (eds.) Workshop in Multimedia Discovery and Mining at ECML/PKDD-2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yu, L., Liu, H.: Feature selection for high-dimensional data: A fast correlation-based filter solution. In: Proc. 20th Intl. Conf. Machine Learning, pp. 856–863 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Qinlan, J.: C4.5: Programs for machine learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Press, W.H., Flannery, B.P., Teukolsky, S.A., Vetterling, W.T.: Numerical recipes in C. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Niemann, H.: Klassifikation von Mustern. Springer, Heidelberg (1983)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. IPEM.: IPEM-toolbox (2005) (accessed, September 10, 2005), URL http://www.ipem.ugent.be/Toolbox

  23. Slaney, M.: The Auditory Toolbox. Technical Report 1998-010, Interval Research Corporation (1998) (accessed, November 22, 2005), URL http://rvl4.ecn.purdue.edu/~malcolm/interval/1998-010

  24. Casey, M.: MPEG-7 sound-recognition tools. IEEE Trans. on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 11(6), 737–747 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: Data Mining: Practical machine learning tools and techniques, 2nd edn. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2005)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Simmermacher, C., Deng, D., Cranefield, S. (2006). Feature Analysis and Classification of Classical Musical Instruments: An Empirical Study. In: Perner, P. (eds) Advances in Data Mining. Applications in Medicine, Web Mining, Marketing, Image and Signal Mining. ICDM 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4065. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11790853_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11790853_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36036-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36037-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics