Skip to main content

Argumentation-Based Multi-agent Dialogues for Deliberation

  • Conference paper
Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems (ArgMAS 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4049))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents an argumentation-based approach to deliberation, the process by which two or more agents reach a consensus on a course of action. The kind of deliberation that we are interested in is a process that combines both the selection of an overall goal, the reduction of this goal into sub-goals, and the formation of a plan to achieve the overall goal. We develop a mechanism for doing this, describe how this mechanism can be integrated into a system of argumentation to provide a sound and complete deliberation system, and show how the same process can be achieved through a multi-agent dialogue.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Boutilier, C., Dean, T., Hanks, S.: Decision-theoretic planning: Structural assumptions and computational leverage. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 11, 1–94 (1999)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Bratman, M.E.: Intention, plans, and practical reason. CSLI Publications (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Corkill, D.D.: Hierarchical planning in a distributed environment. In: Proceedings of the International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 168–175 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  4. desJardins, M.E., Durfee, E.H., Ortiz, C.L., Wolverton, M.J.: A survey of research in distributed, continual planning. AI Magazine 21(1) (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Dignum, F., Dunin-Kȩplicz, B., Verbrugge, R.: Agent theory for team formation by dialogue. In: Castelfranchi, C., Lespérance, Y. (eds.) Seventh Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages, Boston, USA, pp. 141–156 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Durfee, E.H., Lesser, V.R.: Partial global planning: A coordination framework for distributed hypothesis formation. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics KDE-1, 63–83 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ephrati, E., Rosenschein, J.S.: Multi-agent planning as the process of merging distributed sub-plans. In: Proceedings of the Twelfth International Workshop on Distributed Artificial Intelligence, pp. 115–129 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T., McBurney, P.: Structuring dialogue between the People and their representatives. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 55–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Grosz, B.J., Kraus, S.: The evolution of SharedPlans. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Rao, A. (eds.) Foundations of Rational Agency. Applied Logic, vol. 14. Kluwer, The Netherlands (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Guestrin, C., Koller, D., Parr, R.: Multiagent planning with factored MDPs. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 1523–1530 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hamblin, C.L.: Fallacies. Methuen and Co. Ltd., London (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hitchcock, D., McBurney, P., Parsons, S.: The eightfold way of deliberation dialogues. International Journal of Intelligent Systems (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Kraus, S., Sycara, K., Evenchik, A.: Reaching agreements through argumentation: a logical model and implementation. Artificial Intelligence 104(1–2), 1–69 (1998)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Levesque, H., Cohen, P., Nunes, J.: On acting together. In: Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 94–99 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Maudet, N., Evrard, F.: A generic framework for dialogue game implementation. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Formal Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, University of Twente, The Netherlands (May 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. McBurney, P.: Rational Interaction. PhD thesis, University of Liverpool (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Panzarasa, P., Jennings, N.R., Norman, T.J.: Formalising collaborative decision making and practical reasoning in multi-agent systems. Journal of Logic and Computation 12(1), 55–117 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Parsons, S., McBurney, P.: Argumentation-based dialogues for agent coordination. Group Decision and Negotiation 12(5), 415–439 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., Amgoud, L.: An analysis of formal inter-agent dialogues. In: 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reed, C.: Dialogue frames in agent communications. In: Demazeau, Y. (ed.) Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Multi-Agent Systems, pp. 246–253. IEEE Press, Los Alamitos (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Schroeder, M., Plewe, D.A., Raab, A.: Ultima ratio: should Hamlet kill Claudius. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 467–468 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sycara, K.: Argumentation: Planning other agents plans. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 517–523 (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Tambe, M.: Towards flexible teamwork. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 7, 83–124 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van der Hoek, W., Wooldridge, M.: Tractable multiagent planning for epistemic goals. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Walton, D.N., Krabbe, E.C.W.: Commitment in Dialogue: Basic Concepts of Interpersonal Reasoning. State University of New York Press, Albany (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zlot, R., Stentz, A.: Market-based multirobot coordination using task abstraction. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Field and Service Robotics (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tang, Y., Parsons, S. (2006). Argumentation-Based Multi-agent Dialogues for Deliberation. In: Parsons, S., Maudet, N., Moraitis, P., Rahwan, I. (eds) Argumentation in Multi-Agent Systems. ArgMAS 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4049. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11794578_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36355-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36356-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics