Skip to main content

Developing a Rule Evaluation Support Method Based on Objective Indices

  • Conference paper
Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology (RSKT 2006)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 4062))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1001 Accesses

Abstract

In this paper, we present an evaluation of a rule evaluation support method for post-processing of mined results with rule evaluation models based on objective indices. To reduce the costs of rule evaluation task, which is one of the key procedures in data mining post-processing, we have developed the rule evaluation support method with rule evaluation models, which are obtained with objective indices of mined classification rules and evaluations of a human expert for each rule. Then we have evaluated performances of learning algorithms for constructing rule evaluation models on the meningitis data mining as an actual problem and five rulesets from the five kinds of UCI datasets. With these results, we show the availability of our rule evaluation support method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hilderman, R.J., Hamilton, H.J.: Knowledge Discovery and Measure of Interest. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tan, P.N., Kumar, V., Srivastava, J.: Selecting the Right Interestingness Measure for Association Patterns. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining KDD-2002, pp. 32–41 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao, Y.Y., Zhong, N.: An Analysis of Quantitative Measures Associated with Rules. In: Zhong, N., Zhou, L. (eds.) PAKDD 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1574, pp. 479–488. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Ohsaki, M., Kitaguchi, S., Kume, S., Yokoi, H., Yamaguchi, T.: Evaluation of Rule Interestingness Measures with a Clinical Dataset on Hepatitis. In: Boulicaut, J.-F., Esposito, F., Giannotti, F., Pedreschi, D. (eds.) PKDD 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3202, pp. 362–373. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Hatazawa, H., Negishi, N., Suyama, A., Tsumoto, S., Yamaguchi, T.: Knowledge Discovery Support from a Meningoencephalitis Database Using an Automatic Composition Tool for Inductive Applications. In: Proc. of KDD Challenge 2000 in conjunction with PAKDD 2000, pp. 28–33 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hettich, S., Blake, C.L., Merz, C.J.: UCI Repository of machine learning databases. University of California, Department of Information and Computer Science, Irvine, CA (1998), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~mlearn/MLRepository.html

  7. Witten, I.H., Frank, E.: DataMining: Practical Machine Learning Tools and Techniques with Java Implementations. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Quinlan, R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hinton, G.E.: Learning distributed representations of concepts. In: Proc. of 8th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Amherest, MA (1986) (reprinted in Morris, R.G.M. (ed.))

    Google Scholar 

  10. Platt, J.: Fast Training of Support Vector Machines using Sequential Minimal Optimization. In: Schölkopf, B., Burges, C., Smola, A. (eds.) Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning, pp. 185–208. MIT Press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Frank, E., Wang, Y., Inglis, S., Holmes, G., Witten, I.H.: Using model trees for classification. Machine Learning 32(1), 63–76 (1998)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Holte, R.C.: Very simple classification rules perform well on most commonly used datasets. Machine Learning 11, 63–91 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Gago, P., Bento, C.: A Metric for Selection of the Most Promising Rules. In: Proc. of Euro. Conf. on the Principles of Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery PKDD-1998, pp. 19–27 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhong, N., Yao, Y.Y., Ohshima, M.: Peculiarity Oriented Multi-Database Mining. IEEE Trans. on Knowledge and Data Engineering 15(4), 952–960 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frank, E., Witten, I.H.: Generating accurate rule sets without global optimization. In: Proc. of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 144–151 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Abe, H., Tsumoto, S., Ohsaki, M., Yamaguchi, T. (2006). Developing a Rule Evaluation Support Method Based on Objective Indices. In: Wang, GY., Peters, J.F., Skowron, A., Yao, Y. (eds) Rough Sets and Knowledge Technology. RSKT 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4062. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11795131_66

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11795131_66

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36297-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36299-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics