Skip to main content

Ontology Analysis on Complexity and Evolution Based on Conceptual Model

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNBI,volume 4075))

Abstract

With the tremendous development in size, the complexity of ontology increases. Thus ontology evaluation becomes extremely important for developers to determine the fundamental characteristics of ontologies in order to improve the quality, estimate cost and reduce future maintenance. Our research examines the concepts and their hierarchy in ontology conceptual model, the common feature of most ontologies, which reflects the fundamental complexity. We suggest some well-defined metrics of complexity, which mainly examine the quantity, ratio and correlativity of concepts and relationships, to evaluate ontology from the viewpoint of complexity and evolution. In the study, we measured three ontologies in Gene Ontology to verify our metrics. The results indicate that these metrics works well, and the biological process ontology is the most complex one from the view of complexity, and the molecular function ontology is the unsteadiest one from the view of evolution.

Supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant No. 90204010.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. http://www.geneontology.org/

  2. Nejdl, W., Wolf, B., Qu, C., Decker, S., Sintek, M., Naeve, A., Nilsson, M., Palmr, M., Risch, T.: Edutella: a p2p networking infrastructure based on rdf. In: Proceedings of the eleventh international conference on World Wide Web, pp. 604–615. ACM Press, New York (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., Lassila, O.: The semantic web. Scientific American 284(5), 34–43 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Das, A., Wu, W., McGuinness, D.: Industrial Strength Ontology Management, The Emerging Semantic Web. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sirin, E., Hendler, J., Parsia, B.: Semiautomatic composition of web services using semantic description. Web Services: Modeling. In: Architecture and Infrastructure Workshop in Conjunction with ICEIS 2003 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Stojanovic, L., Motik, B.: Ontology Evolution within Ontology. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V.R. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS, vol. 2473. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Staab, S., Schnurr, H.-P., Studer, R., Sure, Y.: Knowledge Processes and Ontologies. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(1) (January/February 2001) (Special Issue on Knowledge Management 2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wand, Y., Weber, R.: Research Commentary: Information Systems and Conceptual Modeling - A Research Agenda. Information Systems Research 13(4), 363–376 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Corcho, O., Gomez-Perez, A.: A road map to ontology specification languages. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Knowledge Acquisition, Modeling and Management, Juan-les-Pins, France, pp. 80–96 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Burton-Jones, A., Storey, V.C., Sugumaran, V., Ahluwalia, P.: Assessing the effectiveness of the daml ontologies for the semantic web. In: Eighth International Conference on Applications of Natural Language to Information Systems (June 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Yao, H., Orme, A.M., Etzkorn, L.: Cohesion Metrics for Ontology Design and Application. Journal of Computer Science 1(1), 107–113 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kang, D., Xu, B., Lu, J., Chu, W.C.: A Complexity Measure for Ontology Based on UML. In: 10th IEEE International Workshop on Future Trends of Distributed Computing Systems (FTDCS 2004), pp. 222–228 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hsi, I.: Analyzing the Conceptual Coherence of Computing Applications Through Ontological Excavation., PhD Thesis Proposal (May 13, 2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mungall, C.: Increased complexity in the GO, http://www.fruitfly.org/~cjm/obol/doc/go-complexity.html

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yang, Z., Zhang, D., Ye, C. (2006). Ontology Analysis on Complexity and Evolution Based on Conceptual Model. In: Leser, U., Naumann, F., Eckman, B. (eds) Data Integration in the Life Sciences. DILS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4075. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11799511_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11799511_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-36593-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-36595-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics