Abstract
This paper gives a finite-state formulation of two closely related descriptions of Finnish prosody proposed by Paul Kiparsky and Nine Elenbaas in the framework of optimality theory. In native Fin- nish words, the primary stress falls on the first syllable. Secondary stress generally falls on every second syllable. However, secondary stress skips a light syllable that is followed by a heavy syllable. Kiparsky and Elenbaas attempt to show that the ternary pattern arises from the interaction of universal metrical constraints.
This paper formalizes the Kiparsky and Elenbaas analyses using the parc/xrce regular expression calculus. It shows how output forms with syllabification, stress and metrical feet are constructed from unmarked input forms. The optimality constraints proposed by Kiparsky and Elenbaas are reformulated in finite-state terms using lenient composition. The formalization shows that both analyses fail for many types of words.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Karttunen, L.: The insufficiency of paper-and-pencil linguistics: the case of Finnish prosody. In: Butt, M., Dalrymple, M., King, T.H. (eds.) Intelligent Linguistic Architectures: Variations on Themes by Ronald M. Kaplan, pp. 287–300. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2006)
Kiparsky, P.: Finnish noun inflection. In: Nelson, D., Manninen, S. (eds.) Generative Approaches to Finnic and Saami Linguistics: Case, Features and Constraints, pp. 109–161. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2003)
Elenbaas, N.: A Unified Account of Binary and Ternary Stress. Graduate School of Linguistics, Utrecht, Netherlands (1999)
Elenbaas, N., Kager, R.: Ternary rhythm and the lapse constraint. Phonology 16, 273–329 (1999)
Prince, A., Smolensky, P.: Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. Cognitive Science Center, Rutgers (1993); ROA Version (8/2002)
Kager, R.: Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1999)
McCarthy, J.J.: The Foundations of Optimality Theory. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)
Frank, R., Satta, G.: Optimality theory and the generative complexity of constraint violability. Computational Linguistics 24(2), 307–316 (1998)
Karttunen, L.: The proper treatment of optimality in computational phonology. In: FSMNLP 1998, Ankara, Turkey, Bilkent University (1998), cmp-lg/9804002
Eisner, J.: Directional constraint evaluation in Optimality Theory. In: Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2000), Saarbrücken, Germany, pp. 257–263 (2000)
Kaplan, R.M., Kay, M.: Regular models of phonological rule systems. Computational Linguistics 20(3), 331–378 (1994)
Koskenniemi, K.: Two-level morphology. Publication 11, University of Helsinki, Department of General Linguistics, Helsinki (1983)
Kaplan, R.M., Newman, P.S.: Lexical resource reconciliation in the Xerox Linguistic Environment. In: ACL/EACL 1998 Workshop on Computational Environments for Grammar Development and Linguistic Engineering, Madrid, Spain, pp. 54–61 (1997)
Beesley, K.R., Karttunen, L.: Finite State Morphology. CSLI Publications, Stanford (2003)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Karttunen, L. (2006). A Finite-State Approximation of Optimality Theory: The Case of Finnish Prosody. In: Salakoski, T., Ginter, F., Pyysalo, S., Pahikkala, T. (eds) Advances in Natural Language Processing. FinTAL 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 4139. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11816508_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11816508_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-37334-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-37336-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)