Abstract
In an ant society individuals coming from different groups (lines, strains) bear it own chemical identity and those individuals present discrimination capabilities between different chemical profiles. However, at the collective level these groups may cooperate and act together. To understand this apparent contradiction we have to keep in mind that amplification is the main component of many collective phenomena in social and gregarious insects. We use a model of food recruitment where each group of foragers have its own blend of pheromone trail that is partly recognized by the others groups. We found that a low level of recognition between signals is sufficient to produce a collaborative pattern between groups and that beyond a critical value of recognition. The aggregation of all the groups around the same food source is observed. Such collective response is a generic property of social phenomena governed by amplification processes.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Vander Meer, R.K., Morel, L.: Nestmate recognition in ants. In: Vander Meer, R.K., Breed, M., Winston, M., Espelie, K.E. (eds.) Pheromone Communication in Social Insects, pp. 79–103. Westview Press, Boulder (1998)
Breed, M., Diaz, P.H., Lucero, K.D.: Olfactory information processing in honeybee, Apis mellifera, nestmate recognition. Anim. Behav. 68, 921–928 (2004)
Estoup, A., Solignac, M., Cornuet, J.M.: Precise assessment of the number of patrillines and of genetic relatedness in the honeybee colonies. P. Roy. Soc. Lond. B 258, 1–7 (1994)
Arnold, G., Quenet, B., Cornuet, J.M., Masson, C., De Schepper, B., Estoup, A., Gasqui, P.: Kin recognition in honeybees. Nature 379, 498 (1996)
Rivault, C., Cloarec, A., Sreng, L.: Cuticular extracts inducing aggregation in the German cockroach, Blattella germanica. Anim. Behav. 55, 177–184 (1998)
Kryger, P., Moritz, R.F.A.: Lack of kin recognition in swarming honeybees (Apis mellifera). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 40, 271–276 (1997)
Kirchner, W.H., Arnold, G.: Intracolonial kin discrimination in honey bees: do bees dance with their super-sisters. Anim. Behav. 61, 597–600 (2001)
Heinze, J., Elsishans, C., Hölldobler, B.: No evidence for kin assortment during colony propagation in a polygynous ant. Naturwissenschaften 84, 249–250 (1997)
Amé, J.M., Rivault, C., Deneubourg, J.L.: Cockroach aggregation based on strain odour recognition. Anim. Behav. 68, 793–801 (2004)
Everaerts, C., Farine, J.P., Brossut, R.: Changes of specific cuticular hydrocarbon profiles in the cockroaches Nauphoeta cinera and Leucophaea maderae reared in heteropsecific groups. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 85, 145–150 (1997)
Deneubourg, J.L., Goss, S.: Collective patterns and decision making. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 1, 295–311 (1989)
Camazine, S., Deneubourg, J.L., Franks, N.R., Sneyd, J., Theraulaz, G., Bonabeau, E.: Self-organization in Biological Systems. Princeton University Press, Princeton (2001)
Millor, J., Pham-Delegue, M., Deneubourg, J.L., Camazine, S.: Self-organized defensive behaviour in honeybees. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 12611–12615 (1999)
Visscher, P.K., Camazine, S.: Collective decisions and cognition in bees. Nature 397, 400 (1999)
Lucas, C., Pho, D.B., Fresneau, D., Jallon, J.M.: Hydrocarbon circulation and colonial signature in Pachycondyla villosa. J. Insect. Physiol. 50, 595–607 (2004)
Lucas, C.: Etudes des bases chimiques et comportementales de la formation du “visa” colonial chez les Ponérines du genre Pachycondyla. Phd University of Paris XI (2002)
Crozier, R.H.: Genetic aspects of kin recognition: concepts, models, and synthesis. In: Fletcher, D.J.C., Michener, C.D. (eds.) Kin Recognition in Animals, pp. 55–73. John Wiley, New York (1987)
Lahav, S., Soroker, V., Hefetz, A., Vander Meer, R.K.: Direct behavioral evidence for hydrocarbons as ant recognition discriminators. Naturwissenschaften 86, 246–249 (1999)
Dahbi, A., Lenoir, A., Tinaut, A., Taghizadeh, T., Francke, W., Hefetz, A.: Chemistry of the postpharyngeal gland secretion and its implication for the phylogeny of Iberian Cataglyphis species (Hymenoptera, Formicidae). Chemoecology 7, 163–171 (1996)
Nielsen, J., Boomsma, J.J., Oldham, N.J., Petersen, H.C., Morgan, E.D.: Colony-level and season-specific variation in cuticular hydrocarbon profiles of individual workers in the ant Formica truncorum. Insect. Soc. 46, 58–65 (1999)
Hölldobler, B.: The chemistry of social regulation: multicomponent signals in ant societies. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 92, 19–22 (1995)
Hölldobler, B., Wilson, E.O.: The Ants. Harvard University Press Cambridge Massachusetts, Cambridge Massachusetts (1990)
Attygalle, A.B., Morgan, E.D.: Ant trail pheromones. Adv. Insect. Physiol. 18, 1–30 (1985)
Camazine, S., Sneyd, S.: A model of collective nectar source selection by honeybees: self-organization through simple rules. J. Theor. Biol. 149, 547–571 (1991)
Devigne, C., Renon, A.J., Detrain, C.: Out of sight but not out of mind: modulation of recruitment according to home range marking in ants. Anim. Behav. 67, 1023–1029 (2004)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Millor, J., Halloy, J., Amé, JM., Deneubourg, JL. (2006). Individual Discrimination Capability and Collective Choice in Social Insects. In: Dorigo, M., Gambardella, L.M., Birattari, M., Martinoli, A., Poli, R., Stützle, T. (eds) Ant Colony Optimization and Swarm Intelligence. ANTS 2006. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 4150. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11839088_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11839088_15
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-38482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-38483-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)